* Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avformat/mov: Store trak > udta metadata on each stream
[not found] <20250115104018.3605561-1-rbernon@codeweavers.com>
@ 2025-02-04 13:49 ` Martin Storsjö
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Martin Storsjö @ 2025-02-04 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches; +Cc: Rémi Bernon, jamrial
Hi Rémi,
On Wed, 15 Jan 2025, Rémi Bernon wrote:
> Some files keep extra metadata such as 'name' fields within udta, and
> it is useful for Wine to access them with the "export_all" option so
> they can then be exposed to Windows applications.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rémi Bernon <rbernon@codeweavers.com>
> ---
> libavformat/mov.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavformat/mov.c b/libavformat/mov.c
> index c016ce8e41..f067ca4905 100644
> --- a/libavformat/mov.c
> +++ b/libavformat/mov.c
> @@ -354,6 +354,12 @@ static int mov_read_udta_string(MOVContext *c, AVIOContext *pb, MOVAtom atom)
> int (*parse)(MOVContext*, AVIOContext*, unsigned, const char*) = NULL;
> int raw = 0;
> int num = 0;
> + AVDictionary **metadata;
> +
> + if (c->trak_index >= 0 && c->trak_index < c->fc->nb_streams)
> + metadata = &c->fc->streams[c->trak_index]->metadata;
> + else
> + metadata = &c->fc->metadata;
>
> switch (atom.type) {
> case MKTAG( '@','P','R','M'): key = "premiere_version"; raw = 1; break;
> @@ -572,10 +578,10 @@ retry:
> str[str_size] = 0;
> }
> c->fc->event_flags |= AVFMT_EVENT_FLAG_METADATA_UPDATED;
> - av_dict_set(&c->fc->metadata, key, str, 0);
> + av_dict_set(metadata, key, str, 0);
> if (*language && strcmp(language, "und")) {
> snprintf(key2, sizeof(key2), "%s-%s", key, language);
> - av_dict_set(&c->fc->metadata, key2, str, 0);
> + av_dict_set(metadata, key2, str, 0);
> }
> if (!strcmp(key, "encoder")) {
> int major, minor, micro;
> --
> 2.45.2
So instead of storing metadata on the demuxer level, it is stored on the
stream level, to avoid clobbering metadata if multiple streams provide
metadata with the same name.
I guess that sounds reasonable. However, wouldn't this be a notable change
for consumers that currently expect to see such metadata on the demuxer
level?
I guess we don't have any firm guarantees about such things, and if the
metadata specifically is for a track, it is the more correct thing to do
anyway.
I don't have all the usual cases around mov/mp4 metadata fresh in mind
though. CCing James to hear his opinion on this.
// Martin
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread