From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 024E549F7E for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 06:55:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C66268D41C; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 09:55:36 +0300 (EEST) Received: from mail-ed1-f49.google.com (mail-ed1-f49.google.com [209.85.208.49]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 694A968C726 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 09:55:29 +0300 (EEST) Received: by mail-ed1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-6188b6f501cso5932276a12.2 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 23:55:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1755586528; x=1756191328; h=mime-version:references:message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jzSvg6HK0hHIOA8KPzREYa8HFd8r2mEQd6hbPJcBWAA=; b=Ppe4Za0u/7rf/ZYPAOoOumsfFBlHo4SF0uFsE9oZR0H2vbkYgFRRMx/0+XtBFn1gnf XiZSrYuKoLH5lHcXXln11GbDUDVZ82D6O+LN7E7mgLLjmEGvjwQ/ifzjKf15Dwv/oar/ r5+p/Mo4Sv5VLZdPHx3qljOGwqiv0rBRPW6qI7IZMtNjQNfsIUCgMZjxLxnByib+hln1 dQkN+BvFWOojiSKVvbfcIWo58nCrCOHeBafb7HwuoiNrYb4858j1TvG9LidKQPuiXbfF jZTJKrco+xShsyi3DMmGBnQvr5i8HnFWDNMdQeip/zeTRlnSJ8f8/Qq+kw9NdpHa2rcg cIvw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwlkjA90mzML3GdCr3n7MlnxcPJcCg56sT9MWHcE0/vtC8JrKQs QOS/uMZ2Yl+ilDrHL8Rjn6nrYe8m7zUmORVdA/zSXm6I3XcJh12rcTnoks/Evq1I6listdrMxCs Ei3ndFJ1e X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuM40kUFPrasxLr2KKESqnNdnp7rdUBaXjWsV7SI8a4ExM7qQjzYfhfHK2/rzH 7cXUM8eQxk/63fDyc5SrkOUMpunlqP1pAoOcWwlHM0qAdAj/MQlbmsxtxgrGXLclZnP5tXHVjCc m/wGaA6u129oR2MUHyvrhDNJsBqpe4d1113ele/c5uVW6xXtGPhooL31be7efDuyr22qyahWY+i VSpOumJroaZRy4Ftj05gVolkENdRMFImzN8F4qqHNKUoj1mK86ojKuKoNl+RQsAVf/wr1Ce7Av9 RBeD4ovBEmEJGJT6B4LT0VPHMkH0bMmtrJNlkVgXJPZne+xMmopER0rLXwWIslyRx/7yOaDdlol l8oRCr5ld/fHkn7pie452LkzGsdSndvZBykke7ZeWQ7iBhtPXN+03GlW/GI6lBzsuH/X46AwJXt lCYOIIo5Nz+8Bta9+L X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH3eRSYoZ4y9GaD0Ha78vA46NWwlWux1XAM/fhQs96/hnv1aNS+VENeuxPK79OkA8dUq9tJsw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:5ca:b0:afd:d94b:830d with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-afddd211be8mr153002666b.62.1755586528152; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 23:55:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tunnel335574-pt.tunnel.tserv24.sto1.ipv6.he.net (tunnel335574-pt.tunnel.tserv24.sto1.ipv6.he.net. [2001:470:27:11::2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-afcdcfce50dsm963512566b.71.2025.08.18.23.55.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 18 Aug 2025 23:55:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 09:55:26 +0300 (EEST) To: Timo Rothenpieler via ffmpeg-devel In-Reply-To: <38b3fd27-ad44-48e7-8d23-e5030262905d@rothenpieler.org> Message-ID: <2d10307f-a882-9c39-79f-60fdaba3142@martin.st> References: <38b3fd27-ad44-48e7-8d23-e5030262905d@rothenpieler.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Mailman3 Upgrade X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: =?utf-8?q?Martin_Storsj=C3=B6_via_ffmpeg-devel?= Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Cc: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Martin_Storsj=F6?= , Timo Rothenpieler Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Tue, 19 Aug 2025, Timo Rothenpieler via ffmpeg-devel wrote: > mailman2 has no good way to deal with that in a more reasonable way. > Mailman3 is already set up, and can be migrated to at a moments notice. > The only problem with it is that I really don't like the new archives. > It has ways to better deal with it, like better DMARC/SPF/... support in > general, and support for ARC signing. > > As an example, I already migrated nut-devel: > https://lists.ffmpeg.org/archives/list/nut-devel@ffmpeg.org/latest > > Sooner or later, we will have to migrate no matter what. > Python2 is on its way out, and we will have to upgrade to an OS version that > does not ship it anymore eventually. > > So the question is, should I just migrate ffmpeg-devel, and if that goes > well, pull over all the other lists as well? > > In theory the migration should go without anyone noticing. It worked for > nut-devel, but that's not exactly the most active list. Can the old archives be kept in their current location (assuming they don't fully alias the new URLs?) even if they don't get updates, in order to keep current references working? References to old mails through such URLs is quite common. Judging from nut-devel, the old archives for that seem to be intact and available, so hopefully this is not an issue. // Martin _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".