From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FEF547D50 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2023 19:39:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7A368CAEB; Thu, 19 Oct 2023 22:39:49 +0300 (EEST) Received: from mail-ej1-f44.google.com (mail-ej1-f44.google.com [209.85.218.44]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B69B368CA61 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2023 22:39:42 +0300 (EEST) Received: by mail-ej1-f44.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-9936b3d0286so13401066b.0 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2023 12:39:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1697744382; x=1698349182; darn=ffmpeg.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=FP/kCMIeZrs2yOzHGKlRNc1ZMWESe9h9Vck9wDkad30=; b=mLia/x1kEc2qqpIhsy6zvFmqAqf4jiTeGgzByReY8SvHLn6vUJXs1ENLtspqLt5Kq2 OeCt67lXhsHQEruQvT7IGRZ+7/ct3M4cj1SMuKnaJX7xjCRCkIUo3UYO0fC7e8iXuy4g MmxW0XFvFyLpiuxsoJGgUFZ8s6ibUPIWrqYs7Iye1t/GtML5ff+cADrnmhRSdFTR/Tq9 M+Ju7CmEJEhSOSBTyLWjODhdWeqaOXqsw1AvFFewqbIvYHHWfjYHrOnwreGTOVopbmHF Lr6y+rBI3cgqzN2c2dMLnnK9Zk/c93bNKDL9fJRmXaJ7jlPUJZFbzAVQ+Qqx1VetKJFc DuEA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1697744382; x=1698349182; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=FP/kCMIeZrs2yOzHGKlRNc1ZMWESe9h9Vck9wDkad30=; b=LlVvZd6EpEkGgOnvfssoRAmh3b6R6IpsPweLQXJv9SxVkrWoRxTlmXtf78sGh7h3Tp f/gH2Z6g1PXoQOcjDfpiFQzypRRJpmU+DINF9fv4/HY1HMi+/gZSAKxmo5HplS8LNq3O 1oDzRogQ2Dh9YwjA+lsfM6Xr379yp7Oew5v7Dgl3k2D6/ksCO6rH7Drjp4vO6RgxW7Mo CY/X0WKtJ4cpMW97N+dxuHPTAAx861QQsX2EBJfxmZ6LHdwrb0eivZSMLHJuLORZHb5q lE+hOvO3Gp874pgXXFPQLRWesOD8ctvJGj6Wu19A7wDkKtw3A6fzJPVIQH7NxEn/6GvH J1ZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzGYABlx1AWfvOj4Iav5RuSND/fi/jc5O1LoL/tNfc0ObOASJ5y 5UmRPIah9mIfyXlEwrKa4QruYTlu3Ds= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGZGFC8vQeyD1GcDoLa7QJ8z4PPotqBUsryfJhzFA9wAMdi2bWZBJUk4ablHnOGRW/P3VAbgA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:9716:b0:9c6:6f65:def1 with SMTP id jg22-20020a170907971600b009c66f65def1mr2247850ejc.35.1697744381828; Thu, 19 Oct 2023 12:39:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.104] (84-112-104-25.cable.dynamic.surfer.at. [84.112.104.25]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id pj19-20020a170906d79300b009ad829ed144sm87905ejb.130.2023.10.19.12.39.40 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 19 Oct 2023 12:39:40 -0700 (PDT) From: epirat07@gmail.com To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 21:39:39 +0200 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5937) Message-ID: <27AD53BF-FFCC-4BEA-8776-FCED994A2B0A@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <733b44ea-4a36-4b20-f51e-4b4311dbd527@t-online.de> References: <20231019181840.GN3543730@pb2> <733b44ea-4a36-4b20-f51e-4b4311dbd527@t-online.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] trac spam X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On 19 Oct 2023, at 21:05, Michael Koch wrote: >> IIRC each regex give -10 so multiple matches give more. > > So far, the search strings contain only combinations of keywords, for example "concretevictoria". > False positives are almost impossible. > > I could add shorter keywords, for example "concrete" and "victoria". > Then we would get multiple matches, but also a few false positives. > Especially for people from Canada. Keywords would be: > "ottawa", "halifax", "victoria", "moncton", "nanaimo", "vancouver", > "concrete", "excavating", "fabricators", "lawncare", "landscapedesign", "retainingwalls" > Shall I do that? > > I agree with you that the problem is not trivial. > >> I think the captcha works as intended. It adds cost to the spammer > I doubt its economic for spammers to solve a captcha for having some spam > up for a few hours. > >From my experience looking over Xiph infrastructure, we had a lot of spammers in the past able to solve captchas to post spam on our various services. Captcha only really helped for low-effort automated spam. > It's not only for a few hours. We have the spammer's links in our archives forever. > http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-trac/2023-October/067523.html > Search engines can find the links, and that's what the spammer probably wants. > > Michael > > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".