Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] doc/t2h: Support texinfo 7.0

[Frank Plowman <post@frankplowman.com>]

On 07/11/2023 20:38, epirat07@gmail.com wrote:

> On 7 Nov 2023, at 16:57, Frank Plowman wrote:
>
>> Resolves #10636 (http://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/10636)
>>
>> Texinfo 7.0, released in November 2022, changed the names of various
>> functions. Compiling docs with Texinfo 7.0 results in warnings and
>> improperly formatted documentation. More old names appear to have
>> been removed in Texinfo 7.1, released October 2023, which causes docs
>> compilation to fail.
>>
>> This PR addresses the issue by adding logic to switch between the old
>> and new function names depending on the Texinfo version. Texinfo 6.8
>> produces identical documentation before and after the patch. The change
>> to the CSS makes the documentation generated by Texinfo >= 7.0 appear
>> more similar to that generated by Texinfo <= 6.8.
>>
>> CC
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org/msg1938238.html
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/916104
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Frank Plowman <post@frankplowman.com>
>>
> Thanks!
> Just had a quick look and was wondering why your patch touches the
> bootstrap.min.css?

Texinfo 7.0 produces quite different HTML to Texinfo 6.8. Without that 
change to the CSS, enumerated option flags (i.e. Possible values of x 
are...) render as white text on a white background with Texinfo 7.0 and 
are unreadable. The change removes a style for the selector `.table 
.table` which causes the background to turn white. As far as I can tell, 
it is not actually used anywhere in files generated by Texinfo 6.8.

-- 
https://www.frankplowman.com/

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".