From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53FBC4C879 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2025 23:01:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: ffbox; dkim=fail (body hash mismatch (got b'CFU0bs44CiRF/PPpiE3SdcRkC28/nILFTmnwXoRV9pw=', expected b'tyPw0/ErFmtE5CGebqWS9AdWIVV8dVdNNOcn0EapvW8=')) header.d=overt.org header.a=rsa-sha256 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ffmpeg.org; i=@ffmpeg.org; q=dns/txt; s=mail; t=1761519627; h=date : to : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : reply-to : subject : list-id : list-archive : list-archive : list-help : list-owner : list-post : list-subscribe : list-unsubscribe : from : cc : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from; bh=CFU0bs44CiRF/PPpiE3SdcRkC28/nILFTmnwXoRV9pw=; b=eE5imhMfaNXJmkBqMS6mFBf+ziYYxAd2lNGQGq+YlLKwGVx4ca5f4odODBoCW6gkaMsIx +b4LXHJ9BcJFRSaJXmMR5Sb0ureENlc2lc1qYCIVB592M3sej/TXvMirF4Z/daMNCqSluUw Zy2w4r0lkyoVpEI6ZHugElhx1BsVL+WFgXlBediIwdJpSqJmLWY4x2Os0KxOTnlWVZwwffv qUHj1PKEw65r70C0jN7AwHqNNIgXFU/LyMaMpWuZecWvcGMm+JwR8n9vH7265Ow6hqm6p58 7m9pA1ytl5DRt6HUZYrd3IUV4egW7joGzDT8F1L5ddbQrzfW/Q6iG2xG7VbA== Received: from [172.19.0.2] (unknown [172.19.0.2]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E7E968F681; Mon, 27 Oct 2025 01:00:27 +0200 (EET) ARC-Seal: i=1; cv=none; a=rsa-sha256; d=ffmpeg.org; s=arc; t=1761519596; b=SBpskZr3qvXcAGJbvFmcXhw2prUSIbmPDctI0K2THd6r31rmPxGFvRr+Yt1PkQn2H/GIX t8bwno59uXk1ZX7xrPxqvKU29I9UNPwgPvGxAHadl2S6J7tRWlGorWno0jQYcmq+sY/xXG1 6Ardf3Vwj5nP1+mTL4EOM54HUQDi27cO5FCN8ZMKI3lCYtGN6mPcYo27TA1/35cZNLjb97W icqqrbp8mOinc71LmgNs4AqxCoOlcDjNOLgvohbiNNxMRPxK6yejqPp18CQtuVE8YnBvEY+ u+ThODAhpvTl9Oh+sL9jdr9J4/t/0W4T3Zhsx14i0/OCNMga/6l7xs86Kmvg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffmpeg.org; s=arc; t=1761519596; h=from : sender : reply-to : subject : date : message-id : to : cc : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : content-id : content-description : resent-date : resent-from : resent-sender : resent-to : resent-cc : resent-message-id : in-reply-to : references : list-id : list-help : list-unsubscribe : list-subscribe : list-post : list-owner : list-archive; bh=VsR9nR7fXm6TW14h093B39lWn9IxyAyRTGvjBmI0/kA=; b=ZWIvqYiPnd6PEVMz8cGkgp8HymjEE0t47C2I+as+NmMJdjn+ZaLYWE/JlsqsgPJeffwZC 7N79hiNFxDDmCETyT7V34mhCi7jilryP0mm/qNRpaaVQSglRNl912O2mpYbZ7j21YsSWLQ4 XHqXDzeW933NUPavpDpWGvMX2m93uFH9bGINatC5k0l73Cah6EbXO1PCowN+ZAISixqVo/h g5xIXW8ZfU2+SaFXyJfRh4HjSJN03hyjO1nikrfAFD7Xaf0Rd/ejuZO9WnBfSyf4BEEJIOS dYF8rWug08fMDZW9Cakra5C/0/paVbwM4GHJFekAc2WK1gzwbJAxsCBzKG3w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; ffmpeg.org; dkim=pass header.d=overt.org; arc=none; dmarc=pass header.from=overt.org policy.dmarc=quarantine Authentication-Results: ffmpeg.org; dkim=pass header.d=overt.org; arc=none (Message is not ARC signed); dmarc=pass (Used From Domain Record) header.from=overt.org policy.dmarc=quarantine Received: from mail.overt.org (mail.overt.org [72.14.183.176]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CD3668F4FB for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2025 00:59:45 +0200 (EET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=overt.org; s=mail; t=1761519583; bh=tyPw0/ErFmtE5CGebqWS9AdWIVV8dVdNNOcn0EapvW8=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=VaRA2km2HxdiHVyhPiziFTMn3Ng4tOfSu6Wx6Ntnpyq5XbV0dygLrAB16+GDpR/Xx 2V87vtYUvqQ/fgQY4uKsyFYTFyP4mFYBmf4BjYrkBBVd7R4iP4/xSrFOqlJIgbz8q2 QlB2oZIOXTQ6CuDNtnb3rLVQzW2vAxpWrE2pUWEZXpcJSLZKDKLunk//A+vTIX16q5 JWrPdO0MDvtF43L4v7RVTrXjnwfWQ/bJ1digTkPiIaoAv2AtkZlL/bt2jICmXVkxlR DSnRGKm0kYZ3lAuIgWopen3ee8reIkMYChPX46yEVApGY+1b0V4mJbcBvRkGlyikn+ ghswXaL+qcZXA== Received: from authenticated-user (mail.overt.org [72.14.183.176]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.overt.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E82C601EF for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2025 17:59:43 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 06:59:39 +0800 To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org Message-ID: <20251027065939.2e593ccf@fido7> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID-Hash: AWZEJ745TAMOFDHOHJ5FK2SB5CGU6I26 X-Message-ID-Hash: AWZEJ745TAMOFDHOHJ5FK2SB5CGU6I26 X-MailFrom: SRS0=JKbG=5D=overt.org=philipl@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; header-match-ffmpeg-devel.ffmpeg.org-0; header-match-ffmpeg-devel.ffmpeg.org-1; header-match-ffmpeg-devel.ffmpeg.org-2; header-match-ffmpeg-devel.ffmpeg.org-3; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] Re: [POLL][VOTE] Preferred Issue Tracker List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Archived-At: Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: From: Philip Langdale via ffmpeg-devel Cc: Philip Langdale Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Tue, 21 Oct 2025 04:28:26 +0200 Lynne via ffmpeg-devel wrote: > On 20/10/2025 18:14, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > Hi everyone > > > > We currently have 2 issue trackers (trac and forgejo), > > > > Previous discussion: > > "[RFC] Issue tracker" and "trac ticket statistics" > > https://lists.ffmpeg.org/archives/list/ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org/thread/HS46O6K62MHRHJDJC45XLRMR64RE5IB7/#LMXCTJDF5SIUSX43X7YZ4347U5YHWW33 > > > > I think there are 2 questions, the first is, > > which issue tracker do we want to use going forward? > > And the 2nd question is, about migrating tickets. > > > > First lets establish which tracker we want to use going forward. > > It seems there where 2 options suggested. > > > > "T", Trac, with a potential future switch to redmine (similar to > > trac) > > > > "F", Forgejo > > > > The difference is easy to spell out, > > > > Trac has many more features (more powerfull search, votes on > > tickets, a range of anti spam features, ...) trac seems not very > > actively maintained, redmine seems actively maintained > > > > Forgejo avoids maintaining a seperate issue tracker but its fairly > > basic, also if we ever switch to a different forge having issues in > > forgejo is a factor to consider. > > > > About performance/speed, If someone has data on similar hw and > > similar # tickets and # users, this would be interresting, I was > > unable to find such comparission. > > > > after this Vote, i intend to start one about "migrating tickets." > > > > All GA members can vote, by replying to this mail on ffmpeg-devel, > > duration is 7 days > > I will try to vote last, so i can break a tie if we have one. > > > > If you dont vote, then dont complain about the outcome, > > If you want something else than what was suggeted in the RFC, you > > can of course suggest that too during the vote > > > > thx > > F > > Its where all developers are, rather than specifically only people > who deal with issues. I hardly read trac since it has no > notifications at all about new issues. > The lack of a way to ping devs on trac is a HUGE issue. F --phil _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org To unsubscribe send an email to ffmpeg-devel-leave@ffmpeg.org