From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 535584C89A for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 14:44:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: ffbox; dkim=fail (body hash mismatch (got b'qqJEMScGKSB46JC2g5RmdGW6/6tmvXjVC9ujZInBtKM=', expected b'+3U/6RwI4RszpbkyPVYtcGW/Wykp3a15xG7MZxdse5Q=')) header.d=haasn.xyz header.a=rsa-sha256 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ffmpeg.org; i=@ffmpeg.org; q=dns/txt; s=mail; t=1758120267; h=date : message-id : to : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : reply-to : subject : list-id : list-archive : list-archive : list-help : list-owner : list-post : list-subscribe : list-unsubscribe : from : cc : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from; bh=qqJEMScGKSB46JC2g5RmdGW6/6tmvXjVC9ujZInBtKM=; b=FmUrfeTWfIbHjbWiymzwm+ArH1JfYEesAZLW6MG0XNp6j2shUn5KsIzCPpZ7mTD5tiI9Y a7e6Wb/BCALq/FuBoTUENxLRq77hyhbr0Zbb2Y6gSS68iEYSnQWdOqcF62mBL5zCdz0OBlg IJpVCn3lxgXhDlSFq37uJMPLoXKjSUg8oerRvQ7ErgbCzoXREgynJEg08GhZHIxKQhAiv6Q FEg8U3KmuTnz0v76tbeFMtLhnnbs/wvyEoet/DWThYn3p8rui31bHr4qkfJr/xnHrMunAGi SnmPamG8J2hX/OLfkjOGPm5PbcHQglySaK0L49nMxhJfeZzZv0fjZCfw6L9w== Received: from [172.19.0.4] (unknown [172.19.0.4]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FCF968E9AB; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 17:44:27 +0300 (EEST) ARC-Seal: i=1; cv=none; a=rsa-sha256; d=ffmpeg.org; s=arc; t=1758120265; b=MxtJNCFMch2Vcs5NrtFqszCMw4rmHUzsbKLoCon+IRa/RiqBX/t1tzhJbQ7JHCSqZ2ZMt FHZJ/cqXlG9hIU7/id0zqPee+ys2QUgn6BRvw4bAUGzlPY808GnCBB8ct36Sz7CPmCeY0Pe HyPe95FJQEzBKN0UE3NYfmag9iJo/ihCLmM6ENVENsSIwOmgjW5KMhpVzN9Zc4jhiZJ7QBq D0S4YTjbAxTvRTRw5FauFlpr4N/YTefcajm4qnflXSwe/t0cTVd1UWuNZ5noltFqdGDfTJP I/7U1uGBm7udI/r+6f57Kgs00Q9jF0SplQRjX40Ny0deqxv1r6KIf2WkEAWw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffmpeg.org; s=arc; t=1758120265; h=from : sender : reply-to : subject : date : message-id : to : cc : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : content-id : content-description : resent-date : resent-from : resent-sender : resent-to : resent-cc : resent-message-id : in-reply-to : references : list-id : list-help : list-unsubscribe : list-subscribe : list-post : list-owner : list-archive; bh=qqJEMScGKSB46JC2g5RmdGW6/6tmvXjVC9ujZInBtKM=; b=i/n1Zl0QypnWc8IeT601Cnq6No9oi8AYQ+c7HTf6vd6eIsrjGY9DmO/iSESQhWwlqvz0C JSVdSl7WyP6ricQ0PE5pd7XFDyIaaSJiC8bIwZcogsMn5zkHrVYqYGdnKRfxpRYyhDHIcWl gZSLOfXViED/OlLf7MTDcHnZhpowyEdWmKPycFiza3siN/yS2BTuFSmX1Qvwu173J6KTvGR DPvoE9du7ifUZjcaUhxFl0DtLRIzm73LvKMAS2xdLK8D0NuabrWNb3Bf+Kn7cfZUQL+PPez SQpAhR4OdHONvPYKreWQjtoXt4J8tPC/GyNQ2qGAzhXfwV+nyRWPi9eTgU9g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; ffmpeg.org; dkim=pass header.d=haasn.xyz; arc=none; dmarc=none Authentication-Results: ffmpeg.org; dkim=pass header.d=haasn.xyz; arc=none (Message is not ARC signed); dmarc=none Received: from haasn.dev (haasn.dev [78.46.187.166]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTP id C187368E8C2; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 17:44:06 +0300 (EEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=haasn.xyz; s=mail; t=1758120246; bh=+3U/6RwI4RszpbkyPVYtcGW/Wykp3a15xG7MZxdse5Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=sLV92moGdicuTTxNNBuUcRYNWYdp6qjd+9v5nQaBC0MuBCzuPwptZ3FMsJ296RlJd CMWAB3CZEcK9BLCn6amJGIe0jNGPXfPtb6bM3q0QluYqvyo7i0c96t/geLG041l0pV VFz5MxY4xRvwzAcNTQyygBXQDnL63lsUCrPBWFHg= Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a02:778:160:8f00:b4d8:4db5:901c:254]) by haasn.dev (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id 455BB4062D; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 16:44:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 16:44:05 +0200 Message-ID: <20250917164405.GC833462@haasn.xyz> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches In-Reply-To: <20250916084900.GR29660@pb2> References: <20250916084900.GR29660@pb2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-ID-Hash: 3NUMOFRNNQ5V2B5TNJKCRNJCDL7UYG27 X-Message-ID-Hash: 3NUMOFRNNQ5V2B5TNJKCRNJCDL7UYG27 X-MailFrom: SRS0=J0MX=34=haasn.dev=nand@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; header-match-ffmpeg-devel.ffmpeg.org-0; header-match-ffmpeg-devel.ffmpeg.org-1; header-match-ffmpeg-devel.ffmpeg.org-2; header-match-ffmpeg-devel.ffmpeg.org-3; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] Re: [POLL] [VOTE] code.ffmpeg.org vs. ML List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Archived-At: Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: From: Niklas Haas via ffmpeg-devel Cc: ga@ffmpeg.org, Niklas Haas Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Tue, 16 Sep 2025 10:49:00 +0200 Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi all > > 2 months ago we voted on testing Forgejo vs Gitlab, we picked and tested > Forgejo. And as said in that vote, (and surprisingly, i have not forgotten it) > heres the "after testing" discussion and vote > > do we want to keep Forgejo or switch back to the ML workflow > (or something else) > > F. keep Forgejo as primary forge for patch/git workflow > M. switch back to the ML for patch/git workflow F, with strong preference. I am neutral on the issue of where to have bug tracking for the time being. I am also neutral on GitLab vs ForgeJo - I think both systems have their strengths and weaknesses, although it appears simpler to smooth out ForgeJo's bugs than to modify GitLab's monolithic codebase. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org To unsubscribe send an email to ffmpeg-devel-leave@ffmpeg.org