From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E607A4C8AA for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 03:57:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: ffbox; dkim=fail (body hash mismatch (got b'ppEKamTFpgngYQYLVDUaJP709pXADuvqY8cetp1BBP0=', expected b'FMB4IEtu1Jkb77rcFNPP2d6fu1uhXkf7fQgQOagNAI0=')) header.d=overt.org header.a=rsa-sha256 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ffmpeg.org; i=@ffmpeg.org; q=dns/txt; s=mail; t=1758081456; h=date : to : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : reply-to : subject : list-id : list-archive : list-archive : list-help : list-owner : list-post : list-subscribe : list-unsubscribe : from : cc : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from; bh=ppEKamTFpgngYQYLVDUaJP709pXADuvqY8cetp1BBP0=; b=KFdAVozyH8l4KgM/zleOa+OAw943RJDoWp1rsLDlG81rNyFi58TqUdv6gG+RXi1kwxDUv cb49OqCI7yOc/Ck7QzrCRwE3ZK84tvSkVkBq0RWKCA4GzNUWYkittWWo5diG72z7mX0MZ11 UcOIIwEayaZJV5Ji7HXAaPRfBGRxMgPtKCYSnWu25zAPM8WkzpOSbzZ57fl884YHAp3zLe6 /okF+fgL6ItIRcPlvIJrJSNxFUoQM2JVpmlKH0zPJPoBBu2O7qQUtoEPQKWsye5dEaa7PWU AA7p8TruotBwJfyqkNLZyomo073ODWG1NLd3aeD4ZcKamOTRsd5CwUKhtMHA== Received: from [172.19.0.4] (unknown [172.19.0.4]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5EB68E92D; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 06:57:36 +0300 (EEST) ARC-Seal: i=1; cv=none; a=rsa-sha256; d=ffmpeg.org; s=arc; t=1758081452; b=etTY+Z+Sni5jKiuGdYuXwfhU9o16Vj5WFg6lmf8hAA2A8w2le0ggWSB+u3SindSsNCibA CDiXYkWQaMWRqqBxpWgP3NX+h6XpuRBrUtNvHMbq1r16CuhCruAhS6zJF5iWAlIovNb09+y mEQE2+eUSlZlc2+6vzuGX1F2TIQWQuWmt6fea7pCW7YLodkwTSny769Gwf4IOW180HwWjA3 RF8SYyCAuQYS2/bEu6M+e9UrE1kZffr7q55R3BAEcz+Qnc/4+CfTtSpNe9QQbFJOe65ACcS se5Sy9IEhewMOM0w7e7pTzopHmpAkPYESoT3R5fER+MAGsoZ6UIJwOZ+PUnw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffmpeg.org; s=arc; t=1758081452; h=from : sender : reply-to : subject : date : message-id : to : cc : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : content-id : content-description : resent-date : resent-from : resent-sender : resent-to : resent-cc : resent-message-id : in-reply-to : references : list-id : list-help : list-unsubscribe : list-subscribe : list-post : list-owner : list-archive; bh=1TjvaGnZi/oh0qTFhQC2J6R8Lmbnwyzwdk5n9gKEmwY=; b=haE4ie+eFUvaJ2Z6BUh5ZmzMLt+9XV/GsjjSgBD3GoDfXPxhPWC712NipYHu4cSt4F/0n lxeEyRWy3gXqOCqLL11z3nuFKlSNNUSk/kPiugXU0DZwFsyAPr1N5Op3TAkj+fVLmBwEyuO dzX+OT1CtvpkgW+bm1+JnxKUTG+n4tn8Va/A/emDZ2wzM7bQR6vgMy3zCPzlFoXxIdLnbyy jVAaERHx4TmDo8nzFBJ7aCXwqf+oVC3n4s81SjmjF4r549y6TFYVQu7AIbXEKgKsjZLcZGR xoPrxadYgHUoefKgb1mTQm9bA43vQsgyRMYq23H2qvXT006TfIL0847fuXCQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; ffmpeg.org; dkim=pass header.d=overt.org; arc=none; dmarc=pass header.from=overt.org policy.dmarc=quarantine Authentication-Results: ffmpeg.org; dkim=pass header.d=overt.org; arc=none (Message is not ARC signed); dmarc=pass (Used From Domain Record) header.from=overt.org policy.dmarc=quarantine Received: from mail.overt.org (mail.overt.org [72.14.183.176]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0F3468E899; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 06:57:08 +0300 (EEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=overt.org; s=mail; t=1758081426; bh=FMB4IEtu1Jkb77rcFNPP2d6fu1uhXkf7fQgQOagNAI0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Vy7bkGggDiMKsBHaAoFZDcLjWbCRF3sefiBIE2sefi7L4+dyoY3UaZtTmmtBzNzrm HjNLo96MiF1gBFN5JKlHB1jgdIOdmVtFNIK9rNUpC5K8L5E31ByrzzFgm3g37HQDnZ PHn4r0egUspQci8QCjXd0gKMubTF/zitsL67gT+LKoISocqC2nJKqntsToCE5EDbwh Y6DrvOq0UvOghbe1u4mZyk/Nv/HGTAW9SsKjHuMHsmnFEKGGn8qVk36WAlKqnS6U/n KHyge0Jluumy+wJEt09t9vTtYBAOrffy22OhrzvYmrrucBmt7Rb+jBjsfPFD7KevuY ZaA6I5n6zT5Ng== Received: from authenticated-user (mail.overt.org [72.14.183.176]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.overt.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CA116063F; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 22:57:06 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 20:57:04 -0700 To: Michael Niedermayer Message-ID: <20250916205704.249926f3@fido7> In-Reply-To: <20250916084900.GR29660@pb2> References: <20250916084900.GR29660@pb2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID-Hash: UR3HNQPJ4BOD5I3ZBFO5IIDQHZYE55GF X-Message-ID-Hash: UR3HNQPJ4BOD5I3ZBFO5IIDQHZYE55GF X-MailFrom: SRS0=hpOO=34=overt.org=philipl@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; header-match-ffmpeg-devel.ffmpeg.org-0; header-match-ffmpeg-devel.ffmpeg.org-1; header-match-ffmpeg-devel.ffmpeg.org-2; header-match-ffmpeg-devel.ffmpeg.org-3; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] Re: [POLL] [VOTE] code.ffmpeg.org vs. ML List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Archived-At: Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: From: Philip Langdale via ffmpeg-devel Cc: FFmpeg development discussions and patches , ga@ffmpeg.org, Philip Langdale Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Tue, 16 Sep 2025 10:49:00 +0200 Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi all > > 2 months ago we voted on testing Forgejo vs Gitlab, we picked and > tested Forgejo. And as said in that vote, (and surprisingly, i have > not forgotten it) heres the "after testing" discussion and vote > > do we want to keep Forgejo or switch back to the ML workflow > (or something else) > > F. keep Forgejo as primary forge for patch/git workflow > M. switch back to the ML for patch/git workflow > > all GA members can vote, by publically replying here with a > "F." / "Forgejo" vs "M." / "ML" > End time is in 7 days unless teh community wants to extend that. > (Also if results are inconclusive like because a 3rd option emerges > then ill restart this with condorcet on vote.ffmpeg.org) > > * If we keep forgejo we will likely transition our issue tracker > tickets into forgejo too, discussing with timo yesterday night > indicates that this likely can be done cleaner and neater than at > first expected. > > * if we switch back to the ML, we still could have subsystem > maintainers using their own forge > > > thx > F --phil _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org To unsubscribe send an email to ffmpeg-devel-leave@ffmpeg.org