From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB22B4AE5E for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 21:37:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2805E68D536; Thu, 21 Aug 2025 00:37:54 +0300 (EEST) Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (relay9-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.199]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7502D68D3AE for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2025 00:37:47 +0300 (EEST) Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F10E44418 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 21:37:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 23:37:44 +0200 To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: <20250820213744.GG29660@pb2> References: <20250820182416.GB155735@haasn.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-GND-State: clean X-GND-Score: -85 X-GND-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdefgdduheelgeeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuifetpfffkfdpucggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddunecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenfghrlhcuvffnffculdduhedmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtderredttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefoihgthhgrvghlucfpihgvuggvrhhmrgihvghruceomhhitghhrggvlhesnhhivgguvghrmhgrhigvrhdrtggtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeelkeeggfffiedufeejueffjeduhedttdduledtheevveevtdeiueelhfdtuedtkeenucfkphepgedurdeiiedrieehrddujeeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepgedurdeiiedrieehrddujeeipdhhvghloheplhhotggrlhhhohhsthdpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmihgthhgrvghlsehnihgvuggvrhhmrgihvghrrdgttgdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepuddprhgtphhtthhopehffhhmphgvghdquggvvhgvlhesfhhfmhhpvghgrdhorhhg X-GND-Sasl: michael@niedermayer.cc Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] STF 2025 grant request (2025-09-01 target) X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Cc: Michael Niedermayer Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1566448044028368697==" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --===============1566448044028368697== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ndkYJaVsYmScngRp" Content-Disposition: inline --ndkYJaVsYmScngRp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Pierre On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 09:28:26AM -0700, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux via ffmpeg= -devel wrote: > On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 9:24=E2=80=AFAM Niklas Haas via ffmpeg-devel > wrote: > > > > On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 08:32:39 -0700 Pierre-Anthony Lemieux wrote: > > > Quick reminder that the deadline for submitting your proposal is > > > quickly approaching. > > > > > > Also note that the total amount of the proposed projects is below for > > > the minimum threshold for STF to consider the application. > > > > Despite my initial reservations, I decided to also apply with another > > continuation of the libswscale project. Just letting you know as a head= s up > > that I will add my proposal to the wiki shortly. > > > > How much more is currently needed to meet the minimum threshold? >=20 > @Michael Niedermayer How many of the 100 modules do you realistically > expect to complete? I think the main uncertainilities are 1. If teh community preferrs merges or cherry picks, If they want cherry picks its 100 patch(sets) passing review, adding te= sts where samples are on our server. If we do it as a merge, the work is still there but its different likely less work. Code would be merged in one go, then people could still review the individual modules afterwards, and I still would have the same effort to do to add tests and handle reviews. But maybe fewer people will post reviews with a merge than with cherry picks 2. when the work starts, because i intend to submit some patchset to test the whole process as soon as i am not busy with other work in ffmpeg So we might end up with fewer than 100 if we do some before STF starts 3. In all this I assume that the review process is fairly smooth and reque= sts for major changes would be very rare because that would not work with t= he number of modules. And i assume that either we have testsamples or we dont and so the work adding tests is manageable. But the devil is in the details and tests can lead to detected bugs if the results are different between archs and so on. And then I would have to debug and fix that unknown number of bugs So really if everything is smooth i expect all 100 but if issues arise it can be less. I will know how badly i miscalcuated this only afterwards ;) thx [...] --=20 Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB No great genius has ever existed without some touch of madness. -- Aristotle --ndkYJaVsYmScngRp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABEKAB0WIQSf8hKLFH72cwut8TNhHseHBAsPqwUCaKZAJQAKCRBhHseHBAsP qyl4AJ4zW2Ig1bO9kCjl8hiG2SB0T0gzhwCfbBJDnvBihWUsmtCefH0TztjR0jQ= =4Ih6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ndkYJaVsYmScngRp-- --===============1566448044028368697== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". --===============1566448044028368697==--