Hi Remi On Fri, Aug 08, 2025 at 10:14:52AM +0700, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > > > Le 7 août 2025 19:37:32 GMT+07:00, Nicolas George a écrit : > >Rémi Denis-Courmont (HE12025-08-07): > >> Sure. You can send a list of patch files... And make it even more difficult to review, > > > >What? An attached file is not more difficult to review than a mail sent > >directly by git, > > If your mail client treats attachments the same as inline text, your mail client is very badly broken as a mail client. And if not, then it is obviously much more cumbersome to review an attachment. mime_lookup application/octet-stream text/plain auto_view text/x-patch text/x-diff color body brightwhite default "^Index: .*" color body red default "^-.*" color body green default "^[+].*" color body white default "^ #.*" First re-analyzes "application/octet-stream" and "text/plain" attachments and provides them with the correct mime type according to what the file is the second causes attachments that are patches to be shown and third will colorize patches/diffs even when they are inline I almost dont even notice if a patch is inline or an attachment, both are shown automatically as i look at the mail thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB I have never wished to cater to the crowd; for what I know they do not approve, and what they approve I do not know. -- Epicurus