From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 312094CE05 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 09:18:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5283668C187; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 12:18:20 +0300 (EEST) Received: from haasn.dev (haasn.dev [78.46.187.166]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE5E68B13F for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 12:18:13 +0300 (EEST) Received: from haasn.dev (unknown [10.30.1.1]) by haasn.dev (Postfix) with UTF8SMTP id 10005402F2 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 11:18:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 11:18:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20250811111812.GB506149@haasn.xyz> From: Niklas Haas To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches In-Reply-To: References: <20250803125028.GD4581@haasn.xyz> <20250803124237.GB4581@haasn.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavfi: protection against premultiplied alpha (was: The patch series about premultiplied alpha) X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Sun, 03 Aug 2025 20:15:09 +0200 Nicolas George wrote: > Nicolas George (HE12025-08-03): > > I will send the series here in a few hours. > > Here is a series of patch. I am absolutely not sure I found all the > filters that could be flagged, but the rest can be done as the need > arises. > > Not tested every filter, but it is pretty straightforward. > > I could not find how to download your patch series in a format suitable > for git am from the monster, I used the v2 series, but it should not > change anything. > > Regards, Hi Nicolas, I still think this series overall is a step in the wrong direction; and that our goal should be to move towards negotiation, and not towards some IMO hacky flag that is already deprecated on arrival. However, I decided I would rather just implement the full negotiation at this point, to save ourselves the continued discussion; especially in light of the TC's inaction / radio silence. Can you confirm that, if we implement full negotiation (thus allowing every filter to decide for itself which alpha modes it can ingest), your remaining _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".