On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 06:15:53PM +0200, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
> On 7/28/2025 4:40 PM, Diederick C. Niehorster wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 4:21 PM Michael Niedermayer
> > <michael@niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hi
> > > 
> > > regression: issue aaddresses a regression
> > > bug:        something is not working
> > > 
> > > This is inconsistent
> > > Label X cannot sometimes mean "X is removed" and "X is added"
> > > 
> > > bug seems meaning that the PR adds a bug
> > > regression seems meaning that the PR removes a regression
> > > 
> > > IMO this should be done consistently
> > > a PR can have bugs and it can fix bugs
> > > a PR can cause regressions and it can fix regressions
> > 
> > so lets rename the labels to bug_fix, regression_fix and add has_bug
> > and has_regression. The former two colored green, the latter two
> > colored red.

This sounds reasonable


[...]

> So for an issue, the label would imply that it reports a bug or regression,
> and for a PR that it fixes it respectively.
> 

> Having two split labels for that seems a little unnecessary.

I dont know, i have only used forgejo for a few days


> 
> Or we could just not use the bug/regession label on PRs, cause they do seem
> kinda off there.

thats reasonable too, but it probably should then also not be possible to
select them.

thx

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

No human being will ever know the Truth, for even if they happen to say it
by chance, they would not even known they had done so. -- Xenophanes