From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 842FE4FB72 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2025 23:54:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BA9468E1C0; Sat, 28 Jun 2025 02:54:18 +0300 (EEST) Received: from relay.b.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0040.b.hostedemail.com [64.98.42.40]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86DE468E19F for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2025 02:54:10 +0300 (EEST) Received: from omf04.b.hostedemail.com (omf04 [10.200.6.67]) by unirelay10.b.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601D01C02A8 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2025 23:54:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [HIDDEN] (Authenticated sender: ff@hawaiiantel.net) by omf04.b.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F0185180004 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2025 23:54:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 13:54:04 -1000 From: compn To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org Message-ID: <20250627135404.00003dbd@hawaiiantel.net> In-Reply-To: <20250626005844.GD29660@pb2> References: <20250626005844.GD29660@pb2> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Rspamd-Server: rspamout08 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: F0185180004 X-Stat-Signature: i1yn9rc8k6ykwuja998bhwad89ejjupi X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.32 X-Session-Marker: 666640686177616969616E74656C2E6E6574 X-Session-ID: U2FsdGVkX18jhtJAahsiHnVKt2XSJVUNy6DDasQgcKU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hawaiiantel.net; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=opensrs-2024012500; bh=fH9YlV9iFKAJ13WpqBNI+PIDbAPFimB70HqVsTrTOt8=; b=nNo5oTXb38KXFy/9Vv/R2mv4fhmVhKh0T+9HRXWpaFzfPm5auvf2I9X2z1vThWbaKjBR84DBBthh5ToQ4nYAnXdK9M7HZ+cjfIlNUvuXrW5LWj4FkGRyXh0QUVg1tak1ohzaCH+ZDUS6L7+WN1oUpZn7J2WHFzJYSP6+y7VL1KN7cRKg3JKSMTuOJ3IWNr7KbFBAhVbsdwwHpioFUmMTT9X/vzP0f+5LJvMMdHUgvO70eS7Zl+A0H1STkHagx2iHovs6b+cXDTRM0NSbGNbeTE0bZ+jlzz8+5PPDtvjU1IWsOBMgofS48R8/G0d6RLu84wtINLydgQq/PbChDBAjAA== X-HE-Tag: 1751068446-904474 X-HE-Meta: U2FsdGVkX19yAWNBTAJg4ZNLg5U/ItJczzZPK0EGgKyJwzo8NZm2qHJ0xcu7UyqSxJ/DA2t/9dzqPnB+WzXCPTnTvDl8tJIuFyrba/SyDMXMir/XxSWjJAhW8h5iHho8whHdXCfsQoXAmExU8Tqzb9BwEEmO/xGJ4/OZhs5IdS/CAQYd9FWf9DH8GkqLlt4AKxXDrd4GDyyg+CmU9VXR6O9xgW//flHYJ8Ng4r59N3RrEMOIgOtqyzgyd2kLc3NZtxLYg0v03BKMW92aZ2DLSbO5hQ+1cUx9HAzUONeo4ux9O+zJTmgLZAXLfblDRdgH Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] webp decoding X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 02:58:44 +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi > > some people use webp apparently, and we have no decoder > > There are 2 patchsets > Thilos v13 (native decoder) > Peters libwebp based one > > I tested both and thilos code decodes the files from the 4709 ticket > i was not able to decode anything with peters patch. Iam not sure it > needs some demuxer changes that are missing it also didnt work with > the demuxer chanegs from thilos pacthset. > > What i suggest is ... can we just apply thilos patchset ? > > what do people think about that idea ? > > It does have a review comment about use of nested decoders and direct > rendering not working. But honestly. That decoder (maybe marked as > experimental?) seems better than having no decoder i say go for it. +experimental. once its in , we can see if web browsers use it, then maybe they'll take up the mantle. -compn _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".