[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter/vf_scale: set correct AVFrame SAR if reset_sar=1

[Niklas Haas <ffmpeg@haasn.xyz>]

From: Niklas Haas <git@haasn.dev>

This otherwise generates an inconsistency between the frame state and the
link state, since the link state is set to 1:1 explicitly when `reset_sar`
is enabled, but this line of code unconditionally overwrote the output
frame SAR with the value that would be computed in the absence of `reset_sar`.

cf. vf_scale_cuda, which does this correctly
---
 libavfilter/vf_scale.c | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libavfilter/vf_scale.c b/libavfilter/vf_scale.c
index 62aa872c77..aec765b441 100644
--- a/libavfilter/vf_scale.c
+++ b/libavfilter/vf_scale.c
@@ -854,10 +854,14 @@ scale:
                                            AV_SIDE_DATA_PROP_COLOR_DEPENDENT);
     }
 
-    av_reduce(&out->sample_aspect_ratio.num, &out->sample_aspect_ratio.den,
-              (int64_t)in->sample_aspect_ratio.num * outlink->h * link->w,
-              (int64_t)in->sample_aspect_ratio.den * outlink->w * link->h,
-              INT_MAX);
+    if (scale->reset_sar) {
+        out->sample_aspect_ratio = outlink->sample_aspect_ratio;
+    } else {
+        av_reduce(&out->sample_aspect_ratio.num, &out->sample_aspect_ratio.den,
+                (int64_t)in->sample_aspect_ratio.num * outlink->h * link->w,
+                (int64_t)in->sample_aspect_ratio.den * outlink->w * link->h,
+                INT_MAX);
+    }
 
     if (sws_is_noop(out, in)) {
         av_frame_free(&out);
-- 
2.49.0

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".