Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v8 1/5] Add FATE test for sample from track ticket #2739

From: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v8 1/5] Add FATE test for sample from track ticket #2739
Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 22:06:53 +0200
Message-ID: <20250530200653.GO29660@pb2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABWZ6OQ7sn0MEaD+C8a7OzTFKLKZNSeA=5fn+ovrFg4J4hsLkw@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1125 bytes --]

Hi

On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 05:28:50PM -0500, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le lun. 26 mai 2025 à 13:38, Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc> a
> écrit :
> >
> > On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 01:14:04PM -0500, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> > > Sample available at:
> https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/xrtrna2rxr1j354hrtymq/AGwemlxHYecBLNmQ8Fsy--4?rlkey=lzilr4m9w4gfdqygoe172vvy8&dl=0
> >
> > that file is too big for fate IMHO
> >
> > du -m trac/2739/lavf_ogm_seeking_borked.ogm
> > 231     trac/2739/lavf_ogm_seeking_borked.ogm
> >
> > can it be made (alot) smaller and still test whats relevant ?
> 
> Sure thing.
> 
> In this case, would you mind having a look at the rest of the patchset
> first?
> 
> I wouldn't want this new test to hold up the rest of the work. All you'd
> have to do is ignore the diff related to this test in the penultimate patch.

will apply teh rest of the patchset

thx

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

it is not once nor twice but times without number that the same ideas make
their appearance in the world. -- Aristotle

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 251 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".