From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 017444BD34 for ; Thu, 22 May 2025 11:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D07768DA19; Thu, 22 May 2025 14:24:00 +0300 (EEST) Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (relay2-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.194]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 636FD68D74C for ; Thu, 22 May 2025 14:23:53 +0300 (EEST) Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B12C843163 for ; Thu, 22 May 2025 11:23:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=niedermayer.cc; s=gm1; t=1747913032; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+Aj+QLiDdwfrz0N7WUUWsKr4tfrqkJUQpmNetc5/ENQ=; b=WLj4FqEhYVsGfb4dQ7T3ge5FFDPKLOHh671n+zioFneQdW+4+jqLLeIc4Vp2QGofalUiN4 BrVzq7qaH+2QPfQYqSd3zTptnfAc6eb4fVB9jyh9n1k9x8Uy3mVN+Wh5kg0TbgvP9R4rRm tgy3PXeUFz2vJl69hVBOrww0fSiHmBGjL4v/jxOAzAV1XjYPwW/sr9jwpvpbKnGcpwevq8 d7blZ79yM0TZAJw8wBOZx7EZpYzxySPh3w2VqS++zuaMwT85fZGwDa4BVDfFvTai80/1dc aroRIt7rT4tB736B36iUQ8nVxIFxnoxVLDeKHWD2Up2UgwI9bAme8MJfQJyJEA== Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 13:23:50 +0200 From: Michael Niedermayer To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: <20250522112350.GP29660@pb2> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-GND-State: clean X-GND-Score: -95 X-GND-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtddtgdehkeefucdltddurdegfedvrddttddmucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuifetpfffkfdpucggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddunecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenfghrlhcuvffnffculdehmdenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtreertddtvdenucfhrhhomhepofhitghhrggvlhcupfhivgguvghrmhgrhigvrhcuoehmihgthhgrvghlsehnihgvuggvrhhmrgihvghrrdgttgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepveefvdelvdffgefhgfegffefuedutedvleffudejudegleeigeehueevtefffefhnecuffhomhgrihhnpegtihgrrdhgohhvnecukfhppeeguddrieeirdeijedruddufeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpeeguddrieeirdeijedruddufedphhgvlhhopehlohgtrghlhhhoshhtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhitghhrggvlhesnhhivgguvghrmhgrhigvrhdrtggtpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedupdhrtghpthhtohepfhhfmhhpvghgqdguvghvvghlsehffhhmphgvghdrohhrgh X-GND-Sasl: michael@niedermayer.cc Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Graphprint Patches Overview X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4790750300306959373==" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --===============4790750300306959373== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="T4YXNh3jRJ/F28As" Content-Disposition: inline --T4YXNh3jRJ/F28As Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Kieran On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 08:21:48AM +0100, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel wr= ote: > It's obvious basic testing was not done on this patchset seeing the scale > of memory leaks. >=20 > I would like the TC to decide on reverting and proper resubmission later. Iam not speaking for the TC here 1. The graphprint code was on the ML for a month and resumbitted for review 12 times, basically noone reviewed it (going back to that will not help= it) 2. The graphprint code is very actively worked on (thats normal and good and what git master is for and thats how it improves quickly) 3. The statement that the graphprint code wasnt tested is obviously false softworkz tested it. I tested at least build on multiply platforms 4. "seeing the scale of memory leaks." try to compare this to IAMF "git log --grep IAMF --oneline", IAMF is after a year still receivi= ng frequent security fixes. This is just as a comparission What you are doing is trying to gain from somewhat popular oppinions at the expense of the project and team. many disliked the "opening of a browser" and thats now resolved and reverted, but instead of letting the wounds heal you throw salt in them. And while people are working and improving the code you push another round of animosity I dont really care if the code is all reverted or not. (it seems though wiser to let people work on it as they already do) What i do not agree with is this seeding of animosity you do. This very much reminds me of Simple Sabotage Field Manual https://www.cia.gov/static/5c875f3ec660e092cf893f60b4a288df/SimpleSabotage.= pdf Also there is IMO nothing for the TC at this point. Its actively worked on = code, there is NO disagreement that any bugs or leaks need to be fixed. And reverting this is not going to accelerate any fixes (if any bugs even r= emain). Nor is it affecting anyone not using this new feature. Your mails look like they are just for some sozial media buzz. thx [...] --=20 Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB The misfortune of the wise is better than the prosperity of the fool. -- Epicurus --T4YXNh3jRJ/F28As Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABEKAB0WIQSf8hKLFH72cwut8TNhHseHBAsPqwUCaC8JQgAKCRBhHseHBAsP q9u+AJ9yjvm4oa0JCkiWNiTz3kG20ekAmACfUyHiyoJCJh6u0zJa70g7pbKHt8c= =+J0O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --T4YXNh3jRJ/F28As-- --===============4790750300306959373== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". --===============4790750300306959373==--