From: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] tests/fate/image: add a test for half-float dwab compressed stream
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 23:26:10 +0200
Message-ID: <20250506212610.GH29660@pb2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8a47551a-4162-4ce5-b6ca-04373fb33038@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3292 bytes --]
On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 06:10:22PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 5/6/2025 5:44 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 04:44:06PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > tests/fate/image.mak | 3 +++
> > > tests/ref/fate/rgb-scanline-dwab-half-float | 6 ++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/rgb-scanline-dwab-half-float
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/fate/image.mak b/tests/fate/image.mak
> > > index 042cf6438f..abf204f69f 100644
> > > --- a/tests/fate/image.mak
> > > +++ b/tests/fate/image.mak
> > > @@ -124,6 +124,9 @@ fate-exr-rgb-scanline-pxr24-float-12x8: CMD = framecrc -i $(TARGET_SAMPLES)/exr/
> > > FATE_EXR += fate-exr-rgba-multiscanline-half-b44
> > > fate-exr-rgba-multiscanline-half-b44: CMD = framecrc -i $(TARGET_SAMPLES)/exr/rgba_multiscanline_half_b44.exr -vf scale -pix_fmt gbrapf32le
> > > +FATE_EXR += fate-rgb-scanline-dwab-half-float
> > > +fate-rgb-scanline-dwab-half-float: CMD = framecrc -i $(TARGET_SAMPLES)/exr/rgb_scanline_dwab_half_float.exr -vf scale -pix_fmt gbrpf32le
> > > +
> > > FATE_EXR += fate-exr-rgb-scanline-float-b44
> > > fate-exr-rgb-scanline-float-b44: CMD = framecrc -i $(TARGET_SAMPLES)/exr/rgb_scanline_float_b44.exr -vf scale -pix_fmt gbrpf32le
> > > diff --git a/tests/ref/fate/rgb-scanline-dwab-half-float b/tests/ref/fate/rgb-scanline-dwab-half-float
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000000..a5a1997785
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/tests/ref/fate/rgb-scanline-dwab-half-float
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> > > +#tb 0: 1/25
> > > +#media_type 0: video
> > > +#codec_id 0: rawvideo
> > > +#dimensions 0: 512x512
> > > +#sar 0: 1/1
> > > +0, 0, 0, 1, 3145728, 0xbb11b00a
> >
> > differnt result here: (on linux x86-64)
> >
> > --- ./tests/ref/fate/rgb-scanline-dwab-half-float 2025-05-06 22:40:40.017406113 +0200
> > +++ tests/data/fate/rgb-scanline-dwab-half-float 2025-05-06 22:40:53.297513198 +0200
> > @@ -3,4 +3,4 @@
> > #codec_id 0: rawvideo
> > #dimensions 0: 512x512
> > #sar 0: 1/1
> > -0, 0, 0, 1, 3145728, 0xbb11b00a
> > +0, 0, 0, 1, 3145728, 0x2a15f7aa
> > Test rgb-scanline-dwab-half-float failed. Look at tests/data/fate/rgb-scanline-dwab-half-float.err for details.
>
> Yeah, I can reproduce it, and even if i add "sws_flags
> +accurate_rnd+bitexact" i get the same results (0xbb11b00a on Win64,
> 0x2a15f7aa on Linux x86-64). I also get a different hash in both targets if
> i don't rescale to gbrpf32, so the problem is not in swscale.
>
> Neither Valgrind or gcc-usan complain, so I'm not sure what could be
> producing this difference.
float is not bitexact in C, and float on x86 might use old x87 style while
x86-64 might be SSE*/AVX, so if theres any float in the code slight differences
can happen, no idea if half float in this case is affected by this or not
thx
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Its not that you shouldnt use gotos but rather that you should write
readable code and code with gotos often but not always is less readable
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 251 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-06 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-05 19:44 James Almer
2025-05-06 20:44 ` Michael Niedermayer
2025-05-06 21:10 ` James Almer
2025-05-06 21:26 ` Michael Niedermayer [this message]
2025-05-06 21:39 ` James Almer
2025-05-06 21:51 ` James Almer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250506212610.GH29660@pb2 \
--to=michael@niedermayer.cc \
--cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:
git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git
# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \
ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com
public-inbox-index ffmpegdev
Example config snippet for mirrors.
AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git