From: Frank Plowman <post@frankplowman.com> To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org Cc: Frank Plowman <post@frankplowman.com>, nuomi2021@gmail.com Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavc/vvc: Detect subpic overlaps at CTU level Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 15:38:45 +0100 Message-ID: <20250418143949.24285-1-post@frankplowman.com> (raw) In d5dbcc00d889fb17948b025a468b00ddbea9e058, it was hoped that detection of subpicture overlaps could be performed at the tile level, so as to avoid introducing per-CTU checks. Unfortunately since that patch, fuzzing has indicated there are some structures involving pps_subpic_one_or_more_tiles_slice where tile-level checking is not sufficient. Performing the check at the CTU level should (touch wood) be the be-all and and-all of this, as CTUs are the lowest common denominator of the picture partitioning. Signed-off-by: Frank Plowman <post@frankplowman.com> --- libavcodec/vvc/ps.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) diff --git a/libavcodec/vvc/ps.c b/libavcodec/vvc/ps.c index e8c312d8ac..4edfe408c0 100644 --- a/libavcodec/vvc/ps.c +++ b/libavcodec/vvc/ps.c @@ -402,14 +402,35 @@ static int ctu_rs(const int rx, const int ry, const VVCPPS *pps) return pps->ctb_width * ry + rx; } +static void pps_add_ctu(VVCPPS *pps, int *off, const int x, const int y) +{ + pps->ctb_addr_in_slice[*off] = ctu_rs(x, y, pps); + (*off)++; +} + static int pps_add_ctus(VVCPPS *pps, int *off, const int rx, const int ry, const int w, const int h) { int start = *off; for (int y = 0; y < h; y++) { for (int x = 0; x < w; x++) { - pps->ctb_addr_in_slice[*off] = ctu_rs(rx + x, ry + y, pps); - (*off)++; + pps_add_ctu(pps, off, rx + x, ry + y); + } + } + return *off - start; +} + +// Similar to pps_add_ctus, but with a check to ensure a given CTU isn't used +// multiple times, to be used with some of the more complex partitioning mechanisms. +static int pps_add_ctus_check(VVCPPS *pps, int *off, const int rx, const int ry, + const int w, const int h) +{ + int start = *off; + for (int y = 0; y < h; y++) { + for (int x = 0; x < w; x++) { + if (*off >= pps->ctb_count) + return AVERROR_INVALIDDATA; + pps_add_ctu(pps, off, rx + x, ry + y); } } return *off - start; @@ -451,50 +472,39 @@ static void subpic_tiles(int *tile_x, int *tile_y, int *tile_x_end, int *tile_y_ (*tile_y_end)++; } -static bool mark_tile_as_used(bool *tile_in_subpic, const int tx, const int ty, const int tile_columns) -{ - const size_t tile_idx = ty * tile_columns + tx; - if (tile_in_subpic[tile_idx]) { - /* the tile is covered by other subpictures */ - return false; - } - tile_in_subpic[tile_idx] = true; - return true; -} - -static int pps_subpic_less_than_one_tile_slice(VVCPPS *pps, const VVCSPS *sps, const int i, const int tx, const int ty, int *off, bool *tile_in_subpic) +static int pps_subpic_less_than_one_tile_slice(VVCPPS *pps, const VVCSPS *sps, const int i, const int tx, const int ty, int *off) { - const int subpic_bottom = sps->r->sps_subpic_ctu_top_left_y[i] + sps->r->sps_subpic_height_minus1[i]; - const int tile_bottom = pps->row_bd[ty] + pps->r->row_height_val[ty] - 1; - const bool is_final_subpic_in_tile = subpic_bottom == tile_bottom; - - if (is_final_subpic_in_tile && !mark_tile_as_used(tile_in_subpic, tx, ty, pps->r->num_tile_columns)) - return AVERROR_INVALIDDATA; - - pps->num_ctus_in_slice[i] = pps_add_ctus(pps, off, + const int ret = pps_add_ctus_check(pps, off, sps->r->sps_subpic_ctu_top_left_x[i], sps->r->sps_subpic_ctu_top_left_y[i], sps->r->sps_subpic_width_minus1[i] + 1, sps->r->sps_subpic_height_minus1[i] + 1); - return 0; + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + else { + pps->num_ctus_in_slice[i] = ret; + return 0; + } } static int pps_subpic_one_or_more_tiles_slice(VVCPPS *pps, const int tile_x, const int tile_y, const int x_end, const int y_end, - const int i, int *off, bool *tile_in_subpic) + const int i, int *off) { for (int ty = tile_y; ty < y_end; ty++) { for (int tx = tile_x; tx < x_end; tx++) { - if (!mark_tile_as_used(tile_in_subpic, tx, ty, pps->r->num_tile_columns)) - return AVERROR_INVALIDDATA; - - pps->num_ctus_in_slice[i] += pps_add_ctus(pps, off, + const int ret = pps_add_ctus_check(pps, off, pps->col_bd[tx], pps->row_bd[ty], pps->r->col_width_val[tx], pps->r->row_height_val[ty]); + + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + else + pps->num_ctus_in_slice[i] += ret; } } return 0; } -static int pps_subpic_slice(VVCPPS *pps, const VVCSPS *sps, const int i, int *off, bool *tile_in_subpic) +static int pps_subpic_slice(VVCPPS *pps, const VVCSPS *sps, const int i, int *off) { int tx, ty, x_end, y_end; @@ -503,9 +513,9 @@ static int pps_subpic_slice(VVCPPS *pps, const VVCSPS *sps, const int i, int *of subpic_tiles(&tx, &ty, &x_end, &y_end, sps, pps, i); if (ty + 1 == y_end && sps->r->sps_subpic_height_minus1[i] + 1 < pps->r->row_height_val[ty]) - return pps_subpic_less_than_one_tile_slice(pps, sps, i, tx, ty, off, tile_in_subpic); + return pps_subpic_less_than_one_tile_slice(pps, sps, i, tx, ty, off); else - return pps_subpic_one_or_more_tiles_slice(pps, tx, ty, x_end, y_end, i, off, tile_in_subpic); + return pps_subpic_one_or_more_tiles_slice(pps, tx, ty, x_end, y_end, i, off); } static int pps_single_slice_per_subpic(VVCPPS *pps, const VVCSPS *sps, int *off) @@ -513,18 +523,11 @@ static int pps_single_slice_per_subpic(VVCPPS *pps, const VVCSPS *sps, int *off) if (!sps->r->sps_subpic_info_present_flag) { pps_single_slice_picture(pps, off); } else { - bool tile_in_subpic[VVC_MAX_TILES_PER_AU] = {0}; for (int i = 0; i < pps->r->pps_num_slices_in_pic_minus1 + 1; i++) { - const int ret = pps_subpic_slice(pps, sps, i, off, tile_in_subpic); + const int ret = pps_subpic_slice(pps, sps, i, off); if (ret < 0) return ret; } - - // We only use tile_in_subpic to check that the subpictures don't overlap - // here; we don't use tile_in_subpic to check that the subpictures cover - // every tile. It is possible to avoid doing this work here because the - // covering property of subpictures is already guaranteed by the mechanisms - // which check every CTU belongs to a slice. } return 0; } -- 2.47.0 _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
next reply other threads:[~2025-04-18 14:41 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2025-04-18 14:38 Frank Plowman [this message] 2025-04-27 2:42 ` Nuo Mi 2025-04-27 8:49 ` Frank Plowman
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20250418143949.24285-1-post@frankplowman.com \ --to=post@frankplowman.com \ --cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \ --cc=nuomi2021@gmail.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone: git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \ ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com public-inbox-index ffmpegdev Example config snippet for mirrors. AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git