Hi jb

On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 12:11:39AM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2025, at 02:51, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > 1. I agree we need discussions, transparency and maybe IRC or some other
> >    audio/video form of commuication can be tried. Such discussion should be
> >    public and open. And they must include admins and main authors.
> 
> Great, the mailing list is here for that. It is public and open.

communication is important.
If all project related communication is on the ML, then the ML alone
would be ok. But if significant discussions about the project happens
elsewhere, like in a meeting or in a cafe or pub after the meeting.
Then that should be accessable for everyone remotely. And especially
for the main authors and active developers.

This is not just about technical things. Its about knowing what
people care about, what they want changed, what they agree with.

If half the team doesnt know what the other half wants, thats
a seed for a conflict that could be avoided.

thx

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Observe your enemies, for they first find out your faults. -- Antisthenes