Hi On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 02:43:50AM +0000, Soft Works wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of > > Michael Niedermayer > > Sent: Freitag, 28. Februar 2025 03:29 > > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches > > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/8] ffprobe/avtextformat: Rename and > > move writer functions and options > > > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 01:47:05AM +0000, Soft Works wrote: > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of > > Soft > > > > Works > > > > Sent: Freitag, 28. Februar 2025 02:31 > > > > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches > devel@ffmpeg.org> > > > > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/8] ffprobe/avtextformat: Rename > > and > > > > move writer functions and options > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of > > > > > Michael Niedermayer > > > > > Sent: Freitag, 28. Februar 2025 02:23 > > > > > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches > > > devel@ffmpeg.org> > > > > > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/8] ffprobe/avtextformat: > > Rename > > > > and > > > > > move writer functions and options > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 02:01:34PM +0000, softworkz wrote: > > > > > > From: softworkz > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: softworkz > > > > > > --- > > > > > > fftools/ffprobe.c | 910 ++++++--------------- > > ---- > > > > -- > > > > > - > > > > > > libavutil/Makefile | 1 + > > > > > > libavutil/avtextformat.h | 50 ++ > > > > > > libavutil/textformat/avtextformat.c | 620 +++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > 4 files changed, 848 insertions(+), 733 deletions(-) > > > > > > create mode 100644 libavutil/textformat/avtextformat.c > > > > > > > > > > this and patch 1 crash > > > > > > > > > > ==1574970== Invalid read of size 1 > > > > > ==1574970== at 0x483EF46: strlen (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux- > > > > > gnu/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) > > > > > ==1574970== by 0x7683D14: __vfprintf_internal (vfprintf- > > > > > internal.c:1688) > > > > > ==1574970== by 0x7696F99: __vsnprintf_internal > > (vsnprintf.c:114) > > > > > ==1574970== by 0x1239AA1: av_vbprintf (in ffmpeg/ffprobe_g) > > > > > ==1574970== by 0x1256473: av_log_default_callback (in > > > > > ffmpeg/ffprobe_g) > > > > > ==1574970== by 0x1256162: av_log (in ffmpeg/ffprobe_g) > > > > > ==1574970== by 0x125CB4B: av_opt_set_defaults2 (in > > > > ffmpeg/ffprobe_g) > > > > > ==1574970== by 0x127611C: avtext_context_open (in > > ffmpeg/ffprobe_g) > > > > > ==1574970== by 0x2F9672: main (in ffmpeg/ffprobe_g) > > > > > ==1574970== Address 0xffffffff is not stack'd, malloc'd or > > (recently) > > > > > free'd > > > > > ==1574970== > > > > > ==1574970== > > > > > ==1574970== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 > > > > > (SIGSEGV) > > > > > ==1574970== Access not within mapped region at address 0xFFFFFFFF > > > > > ==1574970== at 0x483EF46: strlen (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux- > > > > > gnu/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) > > > > > ==1574970== by 0x7683D14: __vfprintf_internal (vfprintf- > > > > > internal.c:1688) > > > > > ==1574970== by 0x7696F99: __vsnprintf_internal > > (vsnprintf.c:114) > > > > > ==1574970== by 0x1239AA1: av_vbprintf (in ffmpeg/ffprobe_g) > > > > > ==1574970== by 0x1256473: av_log_default_callback (in > > > > > ffmpeg/ffprobe_g) > > > > > ==1574970== by 0x1256162: av_log (in ffmpeg/ffprobe_g) > > > > > ==1574970== by 0x125CB4B: av_opt_set_defaults2 (in > > > > ffmpeg/ffprobe_g) > > > > > ==1574970== by 0x127611C: avtext_context_open (in > > ffmpeg/ffprobe_g) > > > > > ==1574970== by 0x2F9672: main (in ffmpeg/ffprobe_g) > > > > > ==1574970== If you believe this happened as a result of a stack > > > > > ==1574970== overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but > > > > > ==1574970== possible), you can try to increase the size of the > > > > > ==1574970== main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag. > > > > > ==1574970== The main thread stack size used in this run was > > 8388608. > > > > > > > > > > testcase: ./ffprobe_g -v 99 ~/tickets/3679/wgetmjpegdump > > > > > > > > > > tell me if this file is not in the ticket and ill send it to you > > > > > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > > > > > only patch 8/8 is expected to work. Since this is a RFC for the > > moment, > > > > I spared the time for making sure that every single commit builds. > > > > (please see cover letter notes in 0/8) > > > > > > > > Once the direction is clear, I'll prepare a patchset with all > > commits > > > > working of course. > > > > ok > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Did you try 8/8 - does it pass for you? It's fine locally on x64 > > Linux, on AzDevops Linux x64 and on Patchwork andriy/make_fate_x86. > > > But what bothers me a bit is that it failed on the Chinese CPU system. > > > > i found the issue in 1+2 as a result of bisecting, so no the whole set > > crashed > > > > What was the error when running all including 8/8? > The same? it crashed, i assumed in the same way > > > > > > > testcase: ./ffprobe_g -v 99 ~/tickets/3679/wgetmjpegdump > > > > > > > > > > tell me if this file is not in the ticket and ill send it to you > > Yes please. It doesn't seem to be there (only some pgrep and ncap files). should be in your mailbox thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Old school: Use the lowest level language in which you can solve the problem conveniently. New school: Use the highest level language in which the latest supercomputer can solve the problem without the user falling asleep waiting.