On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 03:25:06AM +0100, Lynne wrote:
> On 27/02/2025 02:10, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
> > ---
> >   doc/developer.texi | 11 +++++------
> >   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/doc/developer.texi b/doc/developer.texi
> > index a1bfe180c9b..6a753f99da6 100644
> > --- a/doc/developer.texi
> > +++ b/doc/developer.texi
> > @@ -179,18 +179,17 @@ int fields = ilace ? 2 : 1;
> >   @end example
> >   @item
> > -No braces around single-line blocks:
> > +No braces around single-line blocks, unless they are followed by an else (to keep future patches cleaner)
> >   @example c, good
> >   // Good
> > -if (bits_pixel == 24)
> > +if (bits_pixel == 24) @{
> >       avctx->pix_fmt = AV_PIX_FMT_BGR24;
> > -else if (bits_pixel == 8)
> > +@} else if (bits_pixel == 8) @{
> >       avctx->pix_fmt = AV_PIX_FMT_GRAY8;
> > -else @{
> > -    av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_ERROR, "Invalid pixel format.\n");
> > +@} else
> >       return AVERROR_INVALIDDATA;
> > -@}
> > +
> >   @end example
> >   @item
> 
> Strongly objecting to this patch. It's all over our codebase, and I like it.
> Literally everywhere you look.
> If future patches need to add more under the branch, then it only needs to
> be done once.
> 
> Such fundamental changes need more than a single patch hastily accepted, and
> should involve the community as a whole, I believe.

Its not a change, look at tools/patcheck

or try:

+    if(this)
+        that
+    else
+        nothat
+

patcheck reports:

missing } prior to else
patcheck.stdout:11:+    else

missing whitespace between keyword and ( (feel free to ignore)
patcheck.stdout:9:+    if(this)

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

If one takes all money from those who grow wealth and gives it to those who
do not grow wealth, 10 years later, almost the same people who where wealthy
will be wealthy again, the same people who where poor will be poor again.