From: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Is the GA democratic ? Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 22:10:37 +0100 Message-ID: <20250121211037.GT4991@pb2> (raw) In-Reply-To: <3b8b62d1-c226-4ac8-9d4d-5e6e94c06de4@gmail.com> [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2600 bytes --] Hi On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 02:53:36PM -0300, James Almer wrote: > On 1/21/2025 2:41 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > Hi > > > > As people likely know i belive it is not but i got a 2nd opinion: > > > > > > I asked chat gpt this: > > You can't possibly be serious. > > > Is it a democracy, if only people can vote who have performed a specific action at least 20 times in the last 3 years? This way 49 of over 2000 people can only vote > > Michael, please, stop trying to push that number. There are not 2000 active > contributors. There's 2000 people currently subscribed to the mailing list > for whatever reason, be it sending patches, reviewing patches, because > mailman/pipermail has no RSS, or just to watch the drama. There where 1892 subscribers in 2011, thats 14 years ago also you sound like an aristrocrat looking out of the window and saying there cant possibly be that many common people, I have never seen them in the palace. > Every other day i get an automated email from mailman telling me about two > or three removed subscriptions because of excessive bounces or similar, and > almost always from unusual domains. > I or anyone else could, right now, go and create a hundred disposable email > addresses, and subscribe all of them. Do you want them to be able to cast a > vote? Can you also create them with email addresses one can find with google which have lifes behind them, are active elsewhere and so on ? > > You can, and i encourage you, to suggest to change the requirements to > access the GA. It can be to make the deadline further into the past, less > upstreamed patches, anything. Being a "member of the commuity" should give them a vote if you want to call it a democracy in relation to the FFmpeg community > You can also, i should remind you, propose people to be part of the GA that > don't currently fulfill the requirements. Do you not see the problem here ? Lets just imagine this would be how the US electorate worked Republicans have a majority, they vote in every Republican Democrats have a majority, they vote in every Democrat Whoever is first can end the democracy If you want a democracy, you need fair rules, rules before everyone is equal if you want to give everyone who fixed a bug a vote right, do that dont vote on people thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB If a bugfix only changes things apparently unrelated to the bug with no further explanation, that is a good sign that the bugfix is wrong. [-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 251 bytes --] _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-21 21:10 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2025-01-21 17:41 Michael Niedermayer 2025-01-21 17:53 ` James Almer 2025-01-21 21:10 ` Michael Niedermayer [this message] 2025-01-21 23:05 ` James Almer 2025-01-22 16:59 ` Michael Niedermayer 2025-01-22 20:00 ` Nicolas George 2025-01-22 20:53 ` Soft Works 2025-01-21 18:13 ` Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel 2025-01-21 18:57 ` James Almer 2025-01-21 20:24 ` Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel 2025-01-21 18:49 ` Niklas Haas 2025-01-21 19:04 ` Soft Works 2025-01-21 20:34 ` Michael Niedermayer
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20250121211037.GT4991@pb2 \ --to=michael@niedermayer.cc \ --cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone: git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \ ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com public-inbox-index ffmpegdev Example config snippet for mirrors. AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git