Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Regarding Git Tooling

[Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2739 bytes --]

Hi

On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 01:04:45PM +0100, Niklas Haas wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 14:39:29 -0600 Marth64 <marth64@proxyid.net> wrote:
> > Hello, in the context of a GA member,
> >
> > I think there is general interest in modernizing technical tooling
> > specifically regarding ML/patch workflow vs. integrated git solution.
> > Both have their merits. I think what we have today is optimized for
> > some but cumbersome for many. Like shopping for a drill, it is good to
> > step back from time to time and ensure we have the right tools.
> >
> > I think the problem statement of productivity being impacted from
> > outgrowing the current tooling is different from who is hosting it.
> >
> > These are some options I noticed interest in (in no particular order):
> > - Forgejo
> > - GitLab
> > - Mailing List/Patch Workflow (current solution)
> 
> Since our last discussion at VDD, I have come to prefer Forgejo over GitLab
> and would be in favor of hosting an instance on ffmpeg.org.
> 

> What are the current barriers to doing this. Michael, since you said that you
> are in favor iff the community agrees with it, should we start a GA vote on
> the matter?

I would instead of a secret GA vote, maybe wait a few days for discussion
to settle down and then just ask people on the ML about (yes vs no) (strong vs weak)
and a short paragraph about a switch to Forgejo

As well as a 2nd question:
namely on the threshold
should we switch if we have 51% ? or no strong opposition ? or how to draw
the line?
Also, should we switch if we loose some developers by doing so?

Its possible that will give us a clear consensus already
If not, taking another look at the comments from people strongly
opposing in context of yes/no votes in general seems worthy.

Either way i think if this ends with 45% vs 55% i would feel uneasy
I would like to see a clear preferrance of the community, something like
20% vs 80%.

I think a simple count of yes/no strong/weak and what threshold people prefer
seems enough and it seems like "richer" in information.
If this doesnt work out we can just try again in 3 months and if it fails again
we can still go for some hard formal vote. And maybe by the time we will have
cleared up some of the governance disagreements


> 
> Can Timo set it up and maintain it for us?

IIUC timo can do it but he should reply himself i think

thx

[...]

-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Breaking DRM is a little like attempting to break through a door even
though the window is wide open and the only thing in the house is a bunch
of things you dont want and which you would get tomorrow for free anyway

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 251 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".