From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 324BB49B5C for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 02:41:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDBFD68B6A7; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 04:41:14 +0200 (EET) Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (relay2-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.194]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D19FD68AFA8 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 04:41:07 +0200 (EET) Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31AE340002 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 02:41:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=niedermayer.cc; s=gm1; t=1737427267; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KQmmv7wNP6FwGn+V5lfmITpAk+tUXsLTb7n2rG8jdGY=; b=k1k6UwYghmMusZFmWvqsehCCEmfC2J8j5s6D4MbAIUkafL8SlE5ILi9s3S6oZFhsy2rcnu FGC0SbVfuHx1xCn43ALPL3u9QUcuTWk8cUHEbVWV3oLqYRKe5thnwnBlVLIWA45qEIPwoX hVnmIcBz1JOvaGZy74+LNQd6DpYJ2H9HmO6Iu9nHphBH+MeB5aJWC+uEbNNS2xmAyvrct8 VAlnsS1sMiH7EiIvtNfOiepoticKJhm25RNIPv/QRK8L8RFWa4qpWak5u2AutUG5zTBbsx VJpFyyONOlOt7LPiq6L5hYZvuM1M1QivOp7laYCg1y9og6km4Y9Jv87Lp+i3xQ== Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 03:41:06 +0100 From: Michael Niedermayer To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: <20250121024106.GF4991@pb2> References: <20250121012624.GC4991@pb2> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20250121012624.GC4991@pb2> X-GND-Sasl: michael@niedermayer.cc Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Regarding Git Tooling X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0705397765746478194==" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --===============0705397765746478194== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J3AhMV956JRbr6sm" Content-Disposition: inline --J3AhMV956JRbr6sm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 02:26:24AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi >=20 > On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 02:39:29PM -0600, Marth64 wrote: > > Hello, in the context of a GA member, > >=20 > > I think there is general interest in modernizing technical tooling > > specifically regarding ML/patch workflow vs. integrated git solution. > > Both have their merits. I think what we have today is optimized for > > some but cumbersome for many. Like shopping for a drill, it is good to > > step back from time to time and ensure we have the right tools. > >=20 > > I think the problem statement of productivity being impacted from > > outgrowing the current tooling is different from who is hosting it. > >=20 > > These are some options I noticed interest in (in no particular order): > > - Forgejo > > - GitLab > > - Mailing List/Patch Workflow (current solution) > >=20 > > If we evaluate this as choosing a software appliance and put aside > > "who is the host" I think we can have a good discussion. There could > > be value in coming to consensus on one step, then moving on to the > > next. > >=20 > > The goal is not to spin around on which tool is better but I am wonderi= ng, >=20 > > - What other options would the community consider and any relevant pros= /cons? >=20 > I dont know why the options are exclusive. One can add a Forgejo on ffmpe= g.org > but leave the Mailing List/Patch Workflow in place for cases where the > maintainer or patch author prefers a ML workflow. >=20 > I mean just add an option and see what happens > Who uses it ? > do people submit patches to it ? > do people enjoy working with it ? > do people hate working with it ? also to elaborate because i have this feeling everything i say lately is misinterpreted if we have Forgejo + ML we can still decide to drop one later and use only one. THis was just a suggestion that seemed easier to agree with for everyone than a hard switch vs not switch. thx [...] --=20 Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. -- George Orwell --J3AhMV956JRbr6sm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABEKAB0WIQSf8hKLFH72cwut8TNhHseHBAsPqwUCZ48JQgAKCRBhHseHBAsP q9rhAJoDc/dN3NRG//CyBBqj1TUyD5YaPwCfRgVK42l6D3S3Id3dczisX3St9QE= =H1vx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J3AhMV956JRbr6sm-- --===============0705397765746478194== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". --===============0705397765746478194==--