On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 10:22:37PM +0200, Tomas Härdin wrote: > fre 2024-07-26 klockan 23:29 +0200 skrev Michael Niedermayer: > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 05:06:04PM -0700, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux > > wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 2:17 AM Tomas Härdin > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > sön 2024-07-21 klockan 14:07 +0900 skrev Pierre-Anthony Lemieux: > > > > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 5:12 PM Tomas Härdin > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > tor 2024-07-18 klockan 23:10 +0900 skrev Pierre-Anthony > > > > > > Lemieux: > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 10:33 PM Tomas Härdin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fre 2024-07-12 klockan 12:51 -0700 skrev Pierre-Anthony > > > > > > > > Lemieux: > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 10:28 PM Tomas Härdin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +            if (s->in_tile_headers == 1 && s->isHT > > > > > > > > > > > && > > > > > > > > > > > (!s- > > > > > > > > > > > > Ccap15_b11)) > > > > > > > > > > > +                av_log(s->avctx, AV_LOG_WARNING, > > > > > > > > > > > "COD > > > > > > > > > > > marker > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > found in HOMOGENEOUS HT set\n"); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How bad is this and the other markers being present > > > > > > > > > > in this > > > > > > > > > > case? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At the very least, it means that signaling is > > > > > > > > > inconsistent > > > > > > > > > within > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > codestream since the standard states that: > > > > > > > > > """ > > > > > > > > > The HOMOGENEOUS set is the set of HTJ2K codestreams > > > > > > > > > where: > > > > > > > > > • none of the functional marker segments, e.g., COD, > > > > > > > > > COC, > > > > > > > > > RGN, > > > > > > > > > QCD, > > > > > > > > > QCC, and POC, are present in any > > > > > > > > > tile-part header; and > > > > > > > > > • no PPT marker segment is present. > > > > > > > > > """ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The point of signalling that a codestream is > > > > > > > > > "HOMOGENEOUS" is > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > allow > > > > > > > > > decoders to configure themselves solely based on > > > > > > > > > information > > > > > > > > > retrieved > > > > > > > > > entirely from the main header. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since, AFAIK, FFMPEG does not rely on the HOMOGENEOUS > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > short- > > > > > > > > > circuit > > > > > > > > > configuration, incorrect HOMOGENEOUS signalling will > > > > > > > > > likely > > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > impact > > > > > > > > > FFMPEG. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It could happen that information in tile headers > > > > > > > > contradict > > > > > > > > information > > > > > > > > in the main header, right? In such a case it sounds like > > > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > can't > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > sure which decode is the correct one. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Per the spec, the decoder uses the COD information in tile- > > > > > > > parts > > > > > > > over > > > > > > > the COD information in the header. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The issue here is that a decoder, upon seeing HOMOGENEOUS, > > > > > > > simply > > > > > > > does > > > > > > > not bother with looking for COD information in tile-parts, > > > > > > > thereby > > > > > > > missing critical information. > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is actually perfectly legal? Then it seems this patch > > > > > > is > > > > > > wrong > > > > > > > > > > What is not "illegal": the HOMOGENEOUS flag being equal to true > > > > > *and* > > > > > having COD marker segments in tile-parts. > > > > > > > > > > This is what the patch detects. > > > > > > > > > > FFMPEG can decode such illegal codestream. Other decoders might > > > > > not. > > > > > > > > > > The question is: what should FFMPEG do? Should FFMPEG exit or > > > > > warn > > > > > and continue. > > > > > > > > If the spec allows it but it's perhaps unadviced then warning > > > > about it > > > > seems reasonable > > > > > > (I totally messed up my double negative. Repeat below. Sorry for > > > the confusion.) > > > > > > What is "illegal": the HOMOGENEOUS flag being equal to true *and* > > > having COD marker segments in tile-parts. > > > > > > This is what the patch detects. > > > > > > FFMPEG can decode such illegal codestream. Other decoders might > > > not. > > > > > > The question is: what should FFMPEG do? Should FFMPEG exit or warn > > > and continue. > > > > Does such a codestream actually exist ? I mean is this just a > > hypothetical case > > or something existing ? > > This is more to stem the stream before anything happens because we were > lax with parsing If such files dont exist then being picky makes sense thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB You can kill me, but you cannot change the truth.