From: "Rémi Denis-Courmont" <remi@remlab.net>
To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavu/riscv: do not fallback to AT_HWCAP auxillary vector
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 18:46:23 +0300
Message-ID: <20240719154623.3546-1-remi@remlab.net> (raw)
If __riscv_hwprobe() fails, then the kernel version is presumably too
old. There is not much point falling back to the auxillary vector.
- The Linux kernel requires I, so the flag is always set on Linux, and
run-time detection is unnecessary. Our RISC-V assembler does anyway not
support targets without I.
- Linux can compile with or without F and D, but it cannot perform
run-time detection for them (a kernel with F support will not boot a
processor without F). The run-time detection is thus useless in that
case. Besides F and D extensions are used throughout the C code, so
their run-time detection would not be practical.
- Support for V was added in a later kernel version than riscv_hwprobe(),
so the system call will always be available if the kernel supports V.
The only exception would be vendor kernel forks, but those are known to
haphasardly pretend to support V on systems without actual V support, or
with only pre-ratification binary-incompatible version. Furthermore, a
large chunk of our optimisations require Zba and/or Zbb which cannot be
detected with HWCAP in those kernels.
For what it is worth, OpenJDK already took a similar action. Note that this
keeps AT_HWCAP usage for platforms with neither C run-time <sys/hwprobe.h>
nor kernel <asm/hwprobe.h>, notably kernels other than Linux.
---
libavutil/riscv/cpu.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavutil/riscv/cpu.c b/libavutil/riscv/cpu.c
index 73abd289a6..04ac404bbf 100644
--- a/libavutil/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/libavutil/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -83,9 +83,8 @@ int ff_get_cpu_flags_riscv(void)
break;
default:
}
- } else
-#endif
-#if HAVE_GETAUXVAL
+ }
+#elif HAVE_GETAUXVAL
{
const unsigned long hwcap = getauxval(AT_HWCAP);
--
2.45.2
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
next reply other threads:[~2024-07-19 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-19 15:46 Rémi Denis-Courmont [this message]
2024-07-19 21:28 ` Brad Smith
2024-07-21 11:22 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240719154623.3546-1-remi@remlab.net \
--to=remi@remlab.net \
--cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:
git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git
# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \
ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com
public-inbox-index ffmpegdev
Example config snippet for mirrors.
AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git