From: "Rémi Denis-Courmont" <remi@remlab.net> To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavu/riscv: do not fallback to AT_HWCAP auxillary vector Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 18:46:23 +0300 Message-ID: <20240719154623.3546-1-remi@remlab.net> (raw) If __riscv_hwprobe() fails, then the kernel version is presumably too old. There is not much point falling back to the auxillary vector. - The Linux kernel requires I, so the flag is always set on Linux, and run-time detection is unnecessary. Our RISC-V assembler does anyway not support targets without I. - Linux can compile with or without F and D, but it cannot perform run-time detection for them (a kernel with F support will not boot a processor without F). The run-time detection is thus useless in that case. Besides F and D extensions are used throughout the C code, so their run-time detection would not be practical. - Support for V was added in a later kernel version than riscv_hwprobe(), so the system call will always be available if the kernel supports V. The only exception would be vendor kernel forks, but those are known to haphasardly pretend to support V on systems without actual V support, or with only pre-ratification binary-incompatible version. Furthermore, a large chunk of our optimisations require Zba and/or Zbb which cannot be detected with HWCAP in those kernels. For what it is worth, OpenJDK already took a similar action. Note that this keeps AT_HWCAP usage for platforms with neither C run-time <sys/hwprobe.h> nor kernel <asm/hwprobe.h>, notably kernels other than Linux. --- libavutil/riscv/cpu.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/libavutil/riscv/cpu.c b/libavutil/riscv/cpu.c index 73abd289a6..04ac404bbf 100644 --- a/libavutil/riscv/cpu.c +++ b/libavutil/riscv/cpu.c @@ -83,9 +83,8 @@ int ff_get_cpu_flags_riscv(void) break; default: } - } else -#endif -#if HAVE_GETAUXVAL + } +#elif HAVE_GETAUXVAL { const unsigned long hwcap = getauxval(AT_HWCAP); -- 2.45.2 _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
next reply other threads:[~2024-07-19 15:46 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-07-19 15:46 Rémi Denis-Courmont [this message] 2024-07-19 21:28 ` Brad Smith 2024-07-21 11:22 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20240719154623.3546-1-remi@remlab.net \ --to=remi@remlab.net \ --cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone: git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \ ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com public-inbox-index ffmpegdev Example config snippet for mirrors. AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git