From: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/4] lavc/mpegvideo: use H263DSP dequant function Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 14:32:46 +0200 Message-ID: <20240610123246.GE2821752@pb2> (raw) In-Reply-To: <E8FAC9C6-0DF1-4E01-B6D0-ECBC2AD6E978@remlab.net> [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3789 bytes --] On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 03:14:14PM +0300, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > > > Le 10 juin 2024 14:41:31 GMT+03:00, Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc> a écrit : > >On Sun, Jun 09, 2024 at 07:23:45PM +0300, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > >> --- > >> libavcodec/mpegvideo.c | 44 ++++++++++-------------------------------- > >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/libavcodec/mpegvideo.c b/libavcodec/mpegvideo.c > >> index 7af823b8bd..9be0fecc8d 100644 > >> --- a/libavcodec/mpegvideo.c > >> +++ b/libavcodec/mpegvideo.c > >> @@ -201,13 +201,11 @@ static void dct_unquantize_mpeg2_inter_c(MpegEncContext *s, > >> static void dct_unquantize_h263_intra_c(MpegEncContext *s, > >> int16_t *block, int n, int qscale) > >> { > >> - int i, level, qmul, qadd; > >> - int nCoeffs; > >> + int qmul = qscale << 1; > >> + int qadd, nCoeffs; > >> > >> av_assert2(s->block_last_index[n]>=0 || s->h263_aic); > >> > >> - qmul = qscale << 1; > >> - > >> if (!s->h263_aic) { > >> block[0] *= n < 4 ? s->y_dc_scale : s->c_dc_scale; > >> qadd = (qscale - 1) | 1; > >> @@ -215,47 +213,24 @@ static void dct_unquantize_h263_intra_c(MpegEncContext *s, > >> qadd = 0; > >> } > >> if(s->ac_pred) > >> - nCoeffs=63; > >> + nCoeffs = 64; > >> else > >> - nCoeffs= s->intra_scantable.raster_end[ s->block_last_index[n] ]; > >> + nCoeffs = s->intra_scantable.raster_end[s->block_last_index[n]] + 1; > >> > >> - for(i=1; i<=nCoeffs; i++) { > >> - level = block[i]; > >> - if (level) { > >> - if (level < 0) { > >> - level = level * qmul - qadd; > >> - } else { > >> - level = level * qmul + qadd; > >> - } > >> - block[i] = level; > >> - } > >> - } > >> + s->h263dsp.h263_dct_unquantize_intra(block, nCoeffs, qmul, qadd); > >> } > >> > >> static void dct_unquantize_h263_inter_c(MpegEncContext *s, > >> int16_t *block, int n, int qscale) > >> { > >> - int i, level, qmul, qadd; > >> + int qmul = qscale << 1; > >> + int qadd = (qscale - 1) | 1; > >> int nCoeffs; > >> > >> av_assert2(s->block_last_index[n]>=0); > >> > >> - qadd = (qscale - 1) | 1; > >> - qmul = qscale << 1; > >> - > >> - nCoeffs= s->inter_scantable.raster_end[ s->block_last_index[n] ]; > >> - > >> - for(i=0; i<=nCoeffs; i++) { > >> - level = block[i]; > >> - if (level) { > >> - if (level < 0) { > >> - level = level * qmul - qadd; > >> - } else { > >> - level = level * qmul + qadd; > >> - } > >> - block[i] = level; > >> - } > >> - } > >> + nCoeffs = s->inter_scantable.raster_end[s->block_last_index[n]] + 1; > >> + s->h263dsp.h263_dct_unquantize_inter(block, nCoeffs, qmul, qadd); > > > >It would be better if the "+ 1" would not be needed and teh functions > >would keep using "<=" > > Why? because its 1 instruction less and the compieler cannot optimize it out. > AFAICT, that just makes the assembler more confusing by requiring an unusual boundary check. > > And then for SVE and RVV, adding one is unavoidable possible, as we need the element count to predicate the vector ops. So we'd just end up having to add one in the assembler instead of C. [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB If a bugfix only changes things apparently unrelated to the bug with no further explanation, that is a good sign that the bugfix is wrong. [-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 251 bytes --] _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-10 12:32 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-06-09 16:23 [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCHv3 1/4] lavc/h263dsp: add DCT dequantisation functions Rémi Denis-Courmont 2024-06-09 16:23 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/4] lavc/mpegvideo: use H263DSP dequant function Rémi Denis-Courmont 2024-06-10 11:41 ` Michael Niedermayer 2024-06-10 12:14 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont 2024-06-10 12:32 ` Michael Niedermayer [this message] 2024-06-09 16:23 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 3/4] checkasm/h263dsp: test dct_unquantize_{intra, inter} Rémi Denis-Courmont 2024-06-09 16:23 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 4/4] lavc/h263dsp: R-V V " Rémi Denis-Courmont -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2024-07-01 19:13 [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/4] lavc/h263dsp: add DCT dequantisation functions Rémi Denis-Courmont 2024-07-01 19:13 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/4] lavc/mpegvideo: use H263DSP dequant function Rémi Denis-Courmont 2024-07-06 15:23 ` Andreas Rheinhardt 2024-07-06 16:10 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont 2024-07-06 16:20 ` Andreas Rheinhardt 2024-07-06 16:47 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont 2024-07-06 18:27 ` Andreas Rheinhardt 2024-06-12 4:47 [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCHv5 1/4] lavc/h263dsp: add DCT dequantisation functions Rémi Denis-Courmont 2024-06-12 4:47 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/4] lavc/mpegvideo: use H263DSP dequant function Rémi Denis-Courmont 2024-06-14 14:33 ` James Almer 2024-06-14 14:45 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont 2024-06-14 15:11 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont 2024-06-14 15:41 ` James Almer 2024-06-14 19:03 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont 2024-06-09 9:27 [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCHv2 1/4] lavc/h263dsp: add DCT dequantisation function Rémi Denis-Courmont 2024-06-09 9:27 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/4] lavc/mpegvideo: use H263DSP dequant function Rémi Denis-Courmont 2024-06-09 16:13 ` Andreas Rheinhardt 2024-06-09 16:39 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20240610123246.GE2821752@pb2 \ --to=michael@niedermayer.cc \ --cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone: git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \ ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com public-inbox-index ffmpegdev Example config snippet for mirrors. AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git