On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 09:53:13AM +0100, Andrew Sayers wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 11:46:18PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Hi
> > 
> > On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 11:10:22AM +0100, Andrew Sayers wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Ping ?
> > > 
> > > Michael, this is in response to your request[0].  I've queued up some more
> > > patches that depend on this and would help attract and retain developers (e.g.
> > > warning when you're looking at old documentation).  What would be involved in
> > > getting this sort of thing on the website itself?
> > 
> > I dont have the time to review this
> > 
> > if you split the patch between updates to to comments and updates to teh actual
> > configuration this may make it easier to review to whoever does review it
> 
> Thanks for letting me know.
> 
> For anyone who does pick this up - this patch does not contain any changes
> to the configuration.  I've attached a default 1.8.2 configuration file in case
> you want to use them for a review, but it's a real timesink so I'd recommend
> the build-and-diff approach in the patch description.
> 
> My interest in this patch was about getting the website itself updated.
> My understanding is that can't happen without Michael's involvement,
> so I'm planning to focus my attention elsewhere.

I can update the file on the server but i cannot currently review a 200+k doxy
configuration diff someone else needs to review whatever needs review for the doxy config

thx


[...]

-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Rewriting code that is poorly written but fully understood is good.
Rewriting code that one doesnt understand is a sign that one is less smart
than the original author, trying to rewrite it will not make it better.