From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 200474A8EE for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 04:33:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C00568D386; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 07:33:24 +0300 (EEST) Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.10]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BD6668D2A9 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 07:33:16 +0300 (EEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1713846803; x=1745382803; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=Jzu9iI/USQbiwgkd5I/oF51soEbuG7tajH03KjQVukc=; b=e1lycMoFNtLqJ/0rRZr1AoN5eICymFdhydXo2X1vex4JOMNrK+foYyuQ OR7vwHpLOt6s+5Id66tUj5qtzwjFjiqGzcL4FUuyfgPLm5fjLRpSHWCQv /BckZ9NRwAa6wM+4DEw8uBAwgt2gnOxxNGPhOFhRaB4byk/bVM9B7FrgS 4N5JPHK2psoMGVPo94TC+sCcwWzHqr9hG8VTqiVkQFdcri+nWWZElz0tU sJkgMOSsQCzKovr8TjJzz7M/DZDUB72zULFAZPeX+SlmcKzM3vyI1uHQf WangbE+CVgHCyEKuFtHmKZYfSUTAJtvTJlSVPHEbdyErEtt1pldC7oe3n w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 74L0gVUSRd+dFCH9K+rbcg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: CezoqZryTl+Pv6Ac8z4uoA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11052"; a="26871883" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,222,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="26871883" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by orvoesa102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Apr 2024 21:33:14 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 9MzYmMORRDWEOEB71eQheQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: jZgN0lreSHKSREfXNpeDNg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,222,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="61689345" Received: from unknown (HELO xhh-dg264.sh.intel.com) ([10.238.2.76]) by smtpauth.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Apr 2024 21:33:12 -0700 From: "Xiang, Haihao" To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 12:32:58 +0800 Message-Id: <20240423043258.30883-1-haihao.xiang@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavc/vp9: Fix regression introduced in 0ba05857 X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Cc: Haihao Xiang Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: From: Haihao Xiang It is possible that ff_progress_frame_await() is called but ff_progress_frame_report() isn't called when a hardware acceleration method is used, so a thread for vp9 decoding might get stuck. Signed-off-by: Haihao Xiang --- libavcodec/vp9.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/libavcodec/vp9.c b/libavcodec/vp9.c index 3adfb98f2d..6e2d18bf95 100644 --- a/libavcodec/vp9.c +++ b/libavcodec/vp9.c @@ -1735,9 +1735,9 @@ static int vp9_decode_frame(AVCodecContext *avctx, AVFrame *frame, if (ret < 0) goto fail; } - ff_progress_frame_report(&s->s.frames[CUR_FRAME].tf, INT_MAX); finish: + ff_progress_frame_report(&s->s.frames[CUR_FRAME].tf, INT_MAX); // ref frame setup for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++) ff_progress_frame_replace(&s->s.refs[i], &s->next_refs[i]); -- 2.34.1 _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".