On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 11:55:02PM +0200, Niklas Haas wrote: > On Mon, 08 Apr 2024 22:18:33 +0200 Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 08:57:11PM +0200, Niklas Haas wrote: > > > From: Niklas Haas > > > > > > This replaces the myriad of existing lists in AVCodec by a unified API > > > call, allowing us to (ultimately) trim down the sizeof(AVCodec) quite > > > substantially, while also making this more trivially extensible. > > > > > > In addition to the already covered lists, add two new entries for color > > > space and color range, mirroring the newly added negotiable fields in > > > libavfilter. > > > > > > I decided to drop the explicit length field from the API proposed by > > > Andreas Rheinhardt, because having it in place ended up complicating > > > both the codec side and the client side implementations, while also > > > being strictly less flexible (it's trivial to recover a length given > > > a terminator, but requires allocation to add a terminator given > > > a length). Using a terminator also presents less of a porting challenge > > > for existing users of the current API. > > > > > > Once the deprecation period passes for the existing public fields, the > > > rough plan is to move the commonly used fields (such as > > > pix_fmt/sample_fmt) into FFCodec, possibly as a union of audio and video > > > configuration types, and then implement the rarely used fields with > > > custom callbacks. > > > --- > > > doc/APIchanges | 5 ++++ > > > libavcodec/avcodec.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > libavcodec/avcodec.h | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > > libavcodec/codec.h | 19 +++++++++++--- > > > libavcodec/codec_internal.h | 21 +++++++++++++++ > > > libavcodec/version.h | 4 +-- > > > 6 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > This patchset seems to overlap a bit with AVOptionRanges > > > > I think ideally the user should at some point be able to query using some > > API on a AVCodecContext/AVCodecParameters/AVFormatContex/AVStream > > what for that specific instance are supported settings for each field > > > > The API here seems to use a enum, which can make sense but it differs from > > how AVOption works which doesnt use enums to identify fields > > I didn't know AVOptionRanges exists; indeed it can be seen as somewhat > overlapping here. That said, there is a vital distinction here: AVOptionRanges > represents *static* limits on what options can be set (e.g. via > `av_opt_set_int`), whereas this API represents *dynamic* limits on what can be > coded. AVOptionRanges where definitly not intended to be static see the docs: * The returned list may depend on other fields in obj like for example profile. that would not be static > > In particular, the list of supported colorspaces etc. can *depend* on the value > of other options. Currently, only strict_std_compliance, but I can easily see > this list growing in the future (e.g. for different profiles, dolbyvision, > ...). > > That aside, I personally find an API based on strings and doubles rather > cumbersome to use, especially when downstream clients expect an enum list. AVOption* is intended to be a generic API. For example something that an App can query to build a drop down menu in a GUI for each parameter For this, it must be possible to iterate over all paremeters, then for each iterate over all possible settings if its a discrete type or range if its a continous type. And then present the user with the corresponding GUI elements thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Does the universe only have a finite lifespan? No, its going to go on forever, its just that you wont like living in it. -- Hiranya Peiri