On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 12:25:01AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 10:00:47PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Hi all
> > 
> > I think we didnt decide on a name for 7.0 yet
> > 
> > Previously suggested names:
> > Darwin,
> > De broglie,
> > Dijkstra,
> > Galois,
> > Gauss,
> > Jacobi,
> > Jemison
> > Johnson
> > Leavitt
> > Maxwell,
> > Mellin,
> > Perelman,
> > Poincaré,
> > Ramanujan,
> > Sagan,
> > Ting
> > Viterbi,
> > Voltaire,
> > de Sitter,
> > 
> > Please reply with what you prefer or add more to the list.
> > If we end in a tie, previously suggested names will be favoured
> > I will vote last so that i can resolve a tie if one occurs.
> 
> I think the outcome is quite clear
> 
> Dijkstra got 7 votes, every other name had only 1

Here are the votes i counted:

Anton       (Paul)
Dijkstra    (Sean, Reto, Marth64, epirat07, Vittorio, Andreas, Niklas)
Leavitt     (Ingo)
NINEVAH     (RaDSL)
Viterbi     (mypopy)
Voltaire    (Lynne)

Thanks to everyone for voting

[...]

-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

If you fake or manipulate statistics in a paper in physics you will never
get a job again.
If you fake or manipulate statistics in a paper in medicin you will get
a job for life at the pharma industry.