From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA2F49B82 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 00:46:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78F068D3ED; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 02:46:49 +0200 (EET) Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (relay9-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.199]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8946368D3BA for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 02:46:43 +0200 (EET) Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8A5BFF802 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 00:46:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=niedermayer.cc; s=gm1; t=1709513203; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qooP6LaZ7H2KhJ7PK0BOaaB2J6cn1ISya2HvRcQmPeM=; b=oIRLx3m8T544QZFzft70JoNJeHGdcSe4NfIsJ1okJpjqeRK7TqnkeBnO2mMk7Xv35OeqxJ 5dKTjD0m9OTc3xJK+tTyS/Q8RBHJXa3B5V/U3ivmcO6pRC7V7SzayiwUpkZi96KAvlQMwg dNDTv/6hT+n3bfoPFk4sn+p8GkstF/BETgJmDTCPAPMTxifNg12qge50rFSrmA8MC9HWGd ifsl5JDMwgMa+lkVeQlFA+TDCLxVk+7OCjdqBTfZq5JXsYFNwskv7Tz4+OJmAlFmihUA1h XZj74VxJ06g872Hp4hDlTfZBsYsgOJg+hDsFyUXgne2VPjMIGXO4nYHIuaS8ww== Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 01:46:42 +0100 From: Michael Niedermayer To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: <20240304004642.GW6420@pb2> References: <20240226224438.1793-1-michael@niedermayer.cc> <20240226224438.1793-2-michael@niedermayer.cc> <5680631.yRUoJKJmfr@basile.remlab.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5680631.yRUoJKJmfr@basile.remlab.net> X-GND-Sasl: michael@niedermayer.cc Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] doc/community: Conflict of interest recusal requirement (Similar to mid part of Antons proposal) X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1048554083310938768==" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --===============1048554083310938768== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hOh5JaJDznaDDjZJ" Content-Disposition: inline --hOh5JaJDznaDDjZJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 10:19:03AM +0200, R=E9mi Denis-Courmont wrote: > Le tiistaina 27. helmikuuta 2024, 0.44.37 EET Michael Niedermayer a =E9cr= it : > > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer > > --- > > doc/community.texi | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > >=20 > > diff --git a/doc/community.texi b/doc/community.texi > > index 8a38c6aca0..fc22a8fa61 100644 > > --- a/doc/community.texi > > +++ b/doc/community.texi > > @@ -84,6 +84,9 @@ If the TC thinks it needs the input from the larger > > community, the TC can call f > >=20 > > Each TC member must vote on such decision according to what is, in the= ir > > view, best for the project. > >=20 > > +If a TC member is aware of a conflict of interest with regards to the = case, > > they must announce it > > +and recuse themselves from the TC discussion and vote. >=20 > It looks like the meaning and intent do not match up here. I would expect= =20 > something like either of: >=20 > * If a TC member is aware of being in a conflict of interest with regards= to=20 > the case, they must announce it and recuse themselves from the TC discuss= ion=20 > and vote. This was the intended meaning, i will update my patch [...] > Again, the effective way to work-around this problem is to keep a large a= nd=20 > diverse enough TC membership to offset the one or few hypothetical dishon= est=20 > votes. This doesnt work. The set of people is very specific, and they will always = be representatives of the community so when 60% of the community works for companies which would benefit by FFmpeg not competing. There would be no realistic way to have a committee that wasnt also 60% affected by this. And for this we need a clear rule. thx [...] --=20 Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Nations do behave wisely once they have exhausted all other alternatives.= =20 -- Abba Eban --hOh5JaJDznaDDjZJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABEIAB0WIQSf8hKLFH72cwut8TNhHseHBAsPqwUCZeUZ6wAKCRBhHseHBAsP q1Z6AJ9s5LPy5dEY2Vy3khadkRBuh53j4ACeN3LPq7oo3q0Z1+kvbkeTE/XSnxc= =+4M8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hOh5JaJDznaDDjZJ-- --===============1048554083310938768== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". --===============1048554083310938768==--