On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 17:01:13 +0100 Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com> wrote:
> Niklas Haas:
> > On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 16:45:50 +0100 Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com> wrote:
> >> I don't think this should be duplicated for every bitdepth.
> > 
> > To clarify, you think the bit depth should be just treated as a runtime
> > parameter instead of this being a template at all? How would you suggest
> > to handle the diference in pixel size between 8-bit and 10/12-bit?
> > 
> > Maybe a middle ground would be to compile this template only twice, once
> > for HBD and once for 8-bit, with the HBD code-path taking the bitdepth
> > as an extra parameter.
> 
> That's my preferred way.
> 
> > 
> > (That's actually what dav1d does internally)

I gave it a try, do you think it's better?