On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 08:20:30AM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2024-02-26 23:47:20)
> > 
> > Look at the 3 patches i just posted.
> > I suspect we can move alot closer to what you suggest without a vote but
> > simply by consensus
> 
> Your patches use a 'must' wording,

Then please reply to them and explain your point, why the wording
is bad, what alternative wording you suggest and why thats better.
Its a patch, we discuss patches here on ffmpeg-devel


> while multiple people would prefer a
> 'should'.
>

> But even more importantly, you are leaving the disputed line as is, so
> it's not solving the problem at all.

The questions about
1. allowing votes under conflict of interrest
2. if votes must be in the best interrest of the project
3. if one can vote on their own disagreements
...

are 3+ seperate things.

You are trying to pack good changes with a change that allows one to
vote on ones own disagreements.

I think a vote should be about what is disputed.
Not on a bunch of things we all seem to agree about bound to something people
disagree about.

thx

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny 
individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities. - Ayn Rand