On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 05:10:11PM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2024-02-20 15:01:11)
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 09:22:57AM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> > [...]
> > > their preferred wording, and then we can have the GA vote on it.
> > 
> > Before this GA vote, we need another extra member discussion/vote.
> > Because the last GA reset droped several developers from the GA
> 
> I see neither why would we "need" such a vote, or why should it be
> related to this one.

Because thats what was done in the past.
The extra member vote was done between a GA reset and the following votes
like the CC/TC votes
The exception was the STF vote because there just was not enough time

We should do this consistently, and
given that we reset the GA every 6 months, thats the natural rate
at which to do a extra member vote (unless there is no other vote then
the extra member vote can be skiped as it would make no difference)

thx

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Nations do behave wisely once they have exhausted all other alternatives. 
-- Abba Eban