From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DCC1496C5 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 00:43:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 167F368D2F8; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 02:43:22 +0200 (EET) Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.195]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1650368D171 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 02:43:16 +0200 (EET) Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B76960002 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 00:43:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=niedermayer.cc; s=gm1; t=1708216995; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9QNnhmo3nCdnGDFY3s3QOS0Mjfa5qdImWH3Dhp2O+vs=; b=DLnsvPANqd+muSrXfE1wQntuXKMAbr/5rEkQZJkfcDV0Mltj87khdeqKotu5hDrC6FVo8h fII0D9mbsuOIIGTUnD8dbI3sD4uISJ6/r0UP6OBpMYf/x4jpj/Z/536nPG8onYQ/1znu+w gWIznAyWlkWeiIp7jxv9WPGtIxvvPLvFCkSn6q7rp+vLu+xxnjcLE7dviiAUu4IZjWynQx kdX9aZXCTFrn8guAuZ2YJb91RsZ+2A04M0MZ/dF9OuWi/WXO1v3tY0SJlujDnkUdiK/nXO aWzTclMdD3Xhz7zXsH7jyYpchMcxr059moqqCMLX2rr0G928n0IuxA2mp96jpg== Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 01:43:14 +0100 From: Michael Niedermayer To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: <20240218004314.GM6420@pb2> References: <594a2da4-0693-483e-82ab-2924b16d8dbb@gyani.pro> <170799405543.32390.14003661310804711658@lain.khirnov.net> <0c3c8b9b-927e-470d-9272-67536279ba15@gyani.pro> <170801340414.21676.5189683358387742257@lain.khirnov.net> <170807419472.21676.17214572018161936192@lain.khirnov.net> <6a46373c-3a6b-4490-9ae9-46d2a72a3e5a@gyani.pro> <170817255879.21676.17805665941049439864@lain.khirnov.net> <170819974399.21676.13449065399578350362@lain.khirnov.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <170819974399.21676.13449065399578350362@lain.khirnov.net> X-GND-Sasl: michael@niedermayer.cc Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] avcodec/s302m: enable non-PCM decoding X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2070494446769075107==" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --===============2070494446769075107== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DFVJuHU0ZDYvvrTi" Content-Disposition: inline --DFVJuHU0ZDYvvrTi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 08:55:43PM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: > Quoting Gyan Doshi (2024-02-17 13:37:38) > > On 2024-02-17 05:52 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > > Quoting Gyan Doshi (2024-02-17 12:46:27) > > >> As a TC member who is part of the disagreement, I believe your > > >> participation is recused. > > > No, I do not think "TC members who commented on a patch lose their ri= ght > > > to vote" is a reasonable interpretation of that rule. > >=20 > > I refer to > >=20 > > "If the disagreement involves a member of the TC, that member should=20 > > recuse themselves from the decision" > >=20 > > at > >=20 > > https://ffmpeg.org/community.html#Announcement > >=20 > > You clearly are one of the parties to the disagreement, and "recuse=20 > > themselves from the decision" is self-explanatory. >=20 > Such a maximalist interpretation makes no sense - why should my opinion > become invalid because I commented on a patch, "If the disagreement involves a member of the TC" does IMHO not preclude commenting on a patch. For a disagreement we need 2 parties. For example one party who wants a patch in and one who blocks the patch. or 2 parties where both block the other. Being a party of a disagreement would not make anyones opinon invalid. But I think it is reasonable that parties of a disagreement cannot be the judge of the disagreement. > but not if I kept it to > myself and let someone else object to your patch? I think the deatils of this would matter. If a TC member simply does nothing and has no involvement and someone else = objects, sure thet TC member could vote. OTOH if a TC member asks someone else to object to hide a conflict of interrest = and then votes. IMO Thats a severe breach of trust and that person should not be in = any committee thx [...] --=20 Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Breaking DRM is a little like attempting to break through a door even though the window is wide open and the only thing in the house is a bunch of things you dont want and which you would get tomorrow for free anyway --DFVJuHU0ZDYvvrTi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABEIAB0WIQSf8hKLFH72cwut8TNhHseHBAsPqwUCZdFSnwAKCRBhHseHBAsP q0Y7AJ42/QNIYYq61U9Q3Ha58E15TcBRyQCfQ2IApbI7rAnfd6rwvz3K6ujjtnE= =QGMq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DFVJuHU0ZDYvvrTi-- --===============2070494446769075107== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". --===============2070494446769075107==--