From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org>
Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100])
	by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E47F4927D
	for <ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com>; Tue,  6 Feb 2024 18:48:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B3A68D062;
	Tue,  6 Feb 2024 20:48:49 +0200 (EET)
Received: from haasn.dev (haasn.dev [78.46.187.166])
 by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F14D68CBAD
 for <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>; Tue,  6 Feb 2024 20:48:43 +0200 (EET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=haasn.xyz; s=mail;
 t=1707245322; bh=orJL3kuKsqtIfZ+Qfooc4f6oq4JYcmHlHu5KndR3zLg=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=miw5PUvWHiXEzBTNp3TYHoQ88CLsBwWZINHxBgV9+bLzwIcegiVNXs6QXMLnXAC6g
 kjBHkc/K4weCKaf1F8/vsCjYcuIxkIVS5g1SlyOzvR6LSZ3yZMcTFaw2pudCDNQ8YP
 5RziZ+23GHTRnzZuJLFURM1YJKE66FEQv0IRwPYE=
Received: from haasn.dev (unknown [10.30.0.2])
 by haasn.dev (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824D840CB5
 for <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>; Tue,  6 Feb 2024 19:48:42 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 19:48:42 +0100
Message-ID: <20240206194842.GB46540@haasn.xyz>
From: Niklas Haas <ffmpeg@haasn.xyz>
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAEEMt2mntao1uqvcohqg6DiSQy-UE65jNWK7_ky=-Bb0gemELg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20240206020642.GW6420@pb2>
 <CAEEMt2=noXqEgeWsuQAicWhaKVP2ZWX35ia+z=guc+UD9uMz6g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20240206151457.GX6420@pb2>
 <CAEEMt2=2ZtEMLneV-rJDo4+_7Zw2i4X7OWhFEfab5-mZHdtbPA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20240206170443.GE61936@haasn.xyz>
 <CAEEMt2mntao1uqvcohqg6DiSQy-UE65jNWK7_ky=-Bb0gemELg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] STF SoWs
X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel.ffmpeg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/options/ffmpeg-devel>,
 <mailto:ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel>,
 <mailto:ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org
Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" <ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org>
Archived-At: <https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/20240206194842.GB46540@haasn.xyz/>
List-Archive: <https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/>
List-Post: <mailto:ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com>

On Tue, 06 Feb 2024 12:02:51 -0500 "Ronald S. Bultje" <rsbultje@gmail.com> wrote:
> I understand that, hypothetically, if STF had funded SDR, this would be
> problematic, because no payment is possible for work a majority of the
> project's constituents doesn't want in.

As far as I understood, it was proposed that the GA votes on which SoWs
are sent to the STF. I don't think something as contentious as SDR would
survive such a vote to begin with.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".