On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 04:26:41PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 10:21:21AM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 10:15 AM Michael Niedermayer > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 09:18:20AM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 9:06 PM Michael Niedermayer < > > > michael@niedermayer.cc> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > 2. Deliverables > > > > > Patches submitted for review to the FFMPEG dev mailing list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think the goal is to get patches merged, not submitted. > > > > > > Yes but the individual developer cannot gurantee that. > > > > > > > In a bad situation, someone could send unmergeable patches and they will > > satisfy the legal requirement above for being paid out. I'm suggesting to > > protect the project against that situation. > > yes > how foolproof do we want that wording to be ? Random try: 1. Description Fix 50% of the outstanding real issues It is explicitly declared here, that if any issues require rewrites or redesigns of modules, these are outside the scope of this SoW. 2. Deliverables Patches submitted for review to the FFMPEG dev mailing list. As well as taking care of all reasonable review comments. thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB While the State exists there can be no freedom; when there is freedom there will be no State. -- Vladimir Lenin