Re: [FFmpeg-devel] STF SoWs

From: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] STF SoWs
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 16:26:41 +0100
Message-ID: <20240206152641.GZ6420@pb2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEEMt2=2ZtEMLneV-rJDo4+_7Zw2i4X7OWhFEfab5-mZHdtbPA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1065 bytes --]

On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 10:21:21AM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 10:15 AM Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 09:18:20AM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 9:06 PM Michael Niedermayer <
> > michael@niedermayer.cc>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >       2. Deliverables
> > > > Patches submitted for review to the FFMPEG dev mailing list.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think the goal is to get patches merged, not submitted.
> >
> > Yes but the individual developer cannot gurantee that.
> >
> 
> In a bad situation, someone could send unmergeable patches and they will
> satisfy the legal requirement above for being paid out. I'm suggesting to
> protect the project against that situation.

yes
how foolproof do we want that wording to be ?

thx

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal.
-- Aristotle

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 251 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".