From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2232B48ED9 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 21:27:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D49768D26D; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 23:27:15 +0200 (EET) Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (relay1-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.193]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C99768D240 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 23:27:09 +0200 (EET) Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67D90240002 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 21:27:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=niedermayer.cc; s=gm1; t=1706563628; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YeZ93KZmOLlA4Ur4zw0IHEob4gmIw1MfV3pafq+ivCM=; b=jhZCaHWnMBuS3qhuFxJyqupNzaodkbR/D95RaiN6SRFoqJddf3i/7LtdaIfN0hk5pkKS1q hvcxqKV8U+YFIK/AtKxZDQ96rK4fJ7t5B3fKGjXT22gHhhGkHnBZptMA+SycAu7zELb2oj J1wUQeltahQc+6RuKoySY1hNNyTBO+L4drVVp/yyHNenCSyt++AKsowU6OI5MT+HZTe6fg sMutR0U5UFKjk9US1dQvIORw3B+iXgEOqz//39uj4GeVX3wvy+IGh0IMpm3EQGDJD7ywCq pFxF3t638S+J6Of3A27JKBvMBwnTsOyChIguB7G9cUahpmv2S9N/wgu77StkbQ== Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 22:27:07 +0100 From: Michael Niedermayer To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: <20240129212707.GF6420@pb2> References: <20240128032549.GN6420@pb2> <317f44d5-6b91-493e-83db-2e397cdc54e6@gmail.com> <20240129182522.GA6420@pb2> <576026bd-20fb-4fec-a3bb-b649058ab804@gmail.com> <20240129192155.GB6420@pb2> <170655955121.8914.4008842728374617514@lain.khirnov.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-GND-Sasl: michael@niedermayer.cc Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Sovereign Tech Fund X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5245668455468590719==" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --===============5245668455468590719== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lrLUmiMCPBhU8YVX" Content-Disposition: inline --lrLUmiMCPBhU8YVX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 09:36:27PM +0100, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 9:19=E2=80=AFPM Anton Khirnov = wrote: >=20 > > Quoting Vittorio Giovara (2024-01-29 21:09:42) > > > This is not something that should be discussed on a public ML > > > > Where do you think it should be discussed then? > > >=20 > IMO anywhere with a more limited set of constituents, such as the GA or t= he > technical committee. For the record, the group that was contacted initially by STF was everyone on the consulting page at the time. This probably made sense to STF as they after all wanted to fund people working. And that page would supposedly list everyone who was available to do work. =46rom there on mainly only one person cared and continued to work on this. For the record, the list of people on the CC also evolved over time, one from STF was added, some people seemingly having no interrest disappear= ed multiple people related to SPI where added. I guess i understand why noone wanted to send this to the ML and i had to .= =2E. seriously, i dont think anyone had any bad intend here. Yes i wanted it on the ML long ago and others wanted to first make sure this was real and actually possible. This ended up being 2 weeks before the next STF meeting but really everyone just tried to do what they thought best for FFmpeg thx [...] --=20 Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB If a bugfix only changes things apparently unrelated to the bug with no further explanation, that is a good sign that the bugfix is wrong. --lrLUmiMCPBhU8YVX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABEIAB0WIQSf8hKLFH72cwut8TNhHseHBAsPqwUCZbgYJwAKCRBhHseHBAsP q6T5AJ0QKWl6CYa8FGy1tnD1f+3NUuI18ACgmIYh3NhIEaXNcyXf34x7gXiOOqM= =PJ22 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lrLUmiMCPBhU8YVX-- --===============5245668455468590719== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". --===============5245668455468590719==--