From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F0247B57 for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2023 10:46:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C004968C432; Sat, 2 Dec 2023 12:46:31 +0200 (EET) Received: from haasn.dev (haasn.dev [78.46.187.166]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B6868C432 for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2023 12:46:25 +0200 (EET) Received: from haasn.dev (unknown [10.30.0.2]) by haasn.dev (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A54476BC for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2023 11:46:23 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=haasn.xyz; s=mail; t=1701513983; bh=tpx9fQmSi+MXL3TmmGy96xH48qPQ5U0x6JfzVJRNY+A=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=YmXkqD/pHBFlYrsjOZNjX9kXb7Y4Y44M9Pjj3ztJFAXFEVMns9zGpWo4WDK9rWsNp ZdKVEQvnNtjFzzRhDzekm+GUAs1AiffoYecc06K3JP9jd8tS83ZbLe5cT0SGCQjunK qZjgt2DaG+uLp8OfJfFxpcY4DES24vK27aNzaTxs= Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2023 11:46:23 +0100 Message-ID: <20231202114623.GB5092@haasn.xyz> From: Niklas Haas To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org In-Reply-To: <170151267933.8914.8672128983028813738@lain.khirnov.net> References: <169917852563.11195.3233039152331028161@lain.khirnov.net> <170116129299.8914.7788150105908081735@lain.khirnov.net> <170151267933.8914.8672128983028813738@lain.khirnov.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] upcoming vote: TC/CC elections X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Sat, 02 Dec 2023 11:24:39 +0100 Anton Khirnov wrote: > So, given that we've had no further reports about voting mistakes, I'm > leaning towards NOT redoing the vote. If anyone has strong opinions one > way or another, feel welcome to comment. Either way we should make a > decision before the vote is closed on Tuesday. One wrong vote out of 51 eligible is an error rate substantially below the average for any kind of vote, ever. I would assume this has a lower impact on the overall results than other sources of noise (mood, weather, recent events, ...), and certainly less error than trying to re-do the vote would introduce. Also, if we now start to question a vote's validity over such minor inconsistensies, after all the recent vote drama, we will begin to set a rather nasty precedent for how future votes should be treated. Finally, remember that human beings make mistakes and can misread even the most basic of instructions. That somebody voted incorrectly is neither fault of the explanation nor of the person voting, and IMO bikeshedding how many ways to rephrase "higher number = more good" is not a productive use of anybody's time. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".