On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 07:34:07PM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: > Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2023-11-12 19:02:31) > > On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 06:43:28PM +0100, J. Dekker wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 12, 2023, at 18:31, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > > On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 11:03:21AM -0300, James Almer wrote: > > > >> On 11/12/2023 10:59 AM, Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel wrote: > > > >> > I will also start the repeat vote now and everybody can hold their > > > >> > horses before going to flamewar. Depending on JB's explanations, he > > > >> > might still prove that the old vote is valid and this repeat vote > > > >> > becomes void. > > > >> > > > >> Or you could have waited for his answer before doing the vote, don't you > > > >> think? Now people got a new vote email that may or may not be valid at all. > > > > > > > > I hope this new vote will result in the same winner as the last > > > > because otherwise we will have more questions and accusations > > > > > > Multiple people (including myself) have already posted their voting URLs publicly > > > so this 'vote' outcome will be extremely questionable at best. > > > > i saw it. > > I guess its your right to protest that way, its your ballot > > > > its a bit unfortunate. > > i have not really finished investigating what exactly happened in the > > previous vote, but more information is still trickling in. > > There where mistakes made in the previous vote though i doubt they > > affected the outcome, but i do not know > > There were mistakes made in this "vote" as well. Even disregarding the > question of its legitimacy, Thilo's list had two duplicates. After > removing them (which it's not clear whether Thilo did - so much for > transparency), it was identical to JB's list except for Thilo's having > three fewer entries. > > One is Gautam, who AFAICT has not had any contact with the project > since 2020. > > One is Ting Fu, whose Intel mailbox no longer exists, and so his > presence or absence on the list does not matter as he cannot receive the > voting link. > > One is Thilo himself, who was added to the list after his assertion that > he voted in 2020 and so should vote now [1]. In other words, he asked to be > added to the list and then used his presence on it to argue that the > list is invalid. Draw your own conclusions about this. > > Overall I simply do not see how is stoking the flames and feeding the > drama supposed to help the project. The main issue is that we, as a > project, failed in 2020 to make the process sufficiently clear, so any > voter list can be questioned. Thankfully it does not matter, because the > result of the vote was so overwhelmingly in favor of one option, that > none of the proposed alternative lists could possibly change it. > > I would thus propose to end wasting time on meaningless arguments and > move on to something actually productive, like reviews, patches, and the > rest of the two proposed votes. i agree i still am working on my investigation of the previous vote and i think i want to show this to a few people before posting it here so it gets a bit peer review first. (also i dont want to post it deeply in a random thread as noone will find that again) (its a very simple terse list ATM) I see through your list above that you are qualified to review this so i will send it to you :) > > > I think anton, thilo and jb should have paused the votes and waited > > until we fully understand the previous votes issues. > > now it becomes only more messy > > previous vote, repeat vote, some agree some disagree thats the right path > > next votes following on top of ? > > some calls to changes to vote admin, some calls to change vote superviser > > some calls to change server > > > > in a week we have 8 servers 16 vote admins 32 vote supervisers and 64 > > different outcomes of the previous vote > > > > we can get rich by renting out all that vote infra we soon will have ;) > > The only reason to have our own vote server in the first place was that > the one run by its author [2] did not implement proportional > representation at the time. That has now changed, so I propose we simply > switch to it. Thilo has fixed the email loging after the last vote. So from now on we will know exactly who get a vote email. This is a big advantage to avoid the sort of mess we have ATM thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Elect your leaders based on what they did after the last election, not based on what they say before an election.