From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E784813C for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2023 13:16:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA5168CBE6; Fri, 10 Nov 2023 15:16:31 +0200 (EET) Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.195]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10B1068C9FE for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2023 15:16:25 +0200 (EET) Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6755960007 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2023 13:16:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 14:16:23 +0100 From: Michael Niedermayer To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: <20231110131623.GP3543730@pb2> References: <169917627924.11195.16676364527851497705@lain.khirnov.net> <2231631.McIRpOxQxk@basile.remlab.net> <20231109174153.GB3543730@pb2> <4683214.UXO7NAtAyn@basile.remlab.net> <20231109181535.GD3543730@pb2> <1c1c9a24-780c-4db6-8365-07da86d17a12@betaapp.fastmail.com> <20231109224938.GI3543730@pb2> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-GND-Sasl: michael@niedermayer.cc Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] upcoming vote: extra members for GA X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7567247050480217022==" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --===============7567247050480217022== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8RBosBUiiMZyy/xL" Content-Disposition: inline --8RBosBUiiMZyy/xL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 11:58:29PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > On Thu, 9 Nov 2023, at 23:49, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 08:30:15PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > >>=20 > >>=20 > >> On Thu, 9 Nov 2023, at 19:15, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >> > On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 07:53:33PM +0200, R=E9mi Denis-Courmont wrot= e: > >> >> Le torstaina 9. marraskuuta 2023, 19.41.53 EET Michael Niedermayer = a =E9crit : > >> > [...] > >> >> If you think some people should be added, as far as I am concerned,= you are of=20 > >> >> course welcome to nudge them via private message to friendly remind= them that=20 > >> >> they can nominate themselves. > >> > > >> > so what i will do then is > >> > If a developer was in the GA before || are just under the threshold = but > >> > active || are part of the infra teams and packaging > >> > i will leave them in the list to be added (that is also what jb sugg= ested) > >>=20 > >> Of course, this seems reasonable. > >>=20 > >> > I will contact them and ask if they want to be in the GA and > >>=20 > >> You should contact who you want, or think is necessary. > >> But they should step forward and say so publicly that they are candida= tes. > > > > last time you collected candidates you said something very different > > > > https://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2020-June/265348.html > > > > "If you are interested in being a candidate, please mail me in private= =20 > > (aka not on the list). > > You can suggest another candidate, but I will validate with them if=20 > > they might agree in the end." > > > > I want to use the exact same process, why you and other people demand > > a higher bar ? >=20 > First, because noone said anything else on that thread to ask for it to b= e public. > And then, because people complained after that it was not public, at the = following meeting. > So we said that we would do differently the following time. Was this a FFmpeg meeting or a (weekly) FFlabs meeting ? ive been in only one FFLabs meeting and that must have been years after thi= s. So obviously thats a differnt case ... And in that one meeting FFmpeg voting was discussed towards the end of the meeting. id like to point out that FFlabs is a commercial entity and not the right place to discuss anything about FFmpeg governance or votes. thx [...] --=20 Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Frequently ignored answer#1 FFmpeg bugs should be sent to our bugtracker. U= ser questions about the command line tools should be sent to the ffmpeg-user ML. And questions about how to use libav* should be sent to the libav-user ML. --8RBosBUiiMZyy/xL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABEIAB0WIQSf8hKLFH72cwut8TNhHseHBAsPqwUCZU4tGgAKCRBhHseHBAsP qzGvAJ9+9COaz6w2PdVcXt4tPe9Qd/T/pQCglkVwgSDIBCu9fm9b/OHNL+5grDU= =jchY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8RBosBUiiMZyy/xL-- --===============7567247050480217022== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". --===============7567247050480217022==--