From: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Release 6.1 Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 19:53:48 +0200 Message-ID: <20231004175348.GN3543730@pb2> (raw) In-Reply-To: <169643275777.6638.11155765500467328776@lain.khirnov.net> [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4291 bytes --] On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 05:19:17PM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote: > Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2023-10-03 21:22:58) > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 08:14:37PM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > > You keep framing this as some kind of a personal campaign against you. > > > It is not. From my perspective, the objections to SDR have been largely > > > technical, and most of the "heat" comes from your refusal to accept that > > > many active developers are against it. > > > > Technical arguments ? > > Yes, several people had technical arguments, I remember Tomas and Remi and some > > others. But at least subjectively i felt that the bulk of people where alot more > > emotional than technical > > > > But let me list a few observations, from memory > > First objection was because processing is done in an external library. > > Then it was found out that was wrong and actually processing is done in the new code > > so the objection flipped and people demanded it to be moved into an external library. > > > > If you object to pink and want blue and when you find out its actually blue you have > > to be happy and become a supporter but what happened was the opposit, the objection > > was simply adjusted to object to whatever was the case and demand whatever was not. > > > > Ok so thats at least one developers "Technical objection" down here, maybe more > > i dont know if anyone else expressed that same initial objection. but lets move on > > > > In all cases we prefer not to have external dependancies, this is the Technical position of FFmpeg > > no, there is no technical argument in this. > > Also personal preferrances of people is not a technical argument. Noone explained why a > > avdevice module with more external depandancies would be ok but a avdevice module with > > fewer external depandancies was not. <-- This last sentance is a technical argument > > I could go as far as call this a proof by contradiction. > > > > If people are happy with a avdevice module and FFmpeg prefers fewer external dependancies > > then my suggestion of first starting with a plain simple self contained avdevice/avformat > > module, would have to be fine too. > > We can always move this to an external library once there is a technical reason for that > > like for example some other software wants to use it > > > > About the attack/rallying/compaign stuff. Ill keep it very brief as its not useful i think. > > Also this is my own personal and subjective view. In fact the whole mail is > > There was alot of (negative) emotion from 1-2 people about SDR. This emotion was what spread > > slash rallied other developers. That came before any technical arguments. > > Now people have picked their flag and march to war. > > > > Everyone will deny it, same as every patriot will fight to the death for the colors of > > the flag of the country and religion they where born into. > > > > My claim, sorry to be stubborn, is that had this started a slight bit different there > > would be little opposition to SDR. Iam not denying that now there are several people > > against it. > > These are largely unfalsifiable claims, so I don't see how they can > productively contribute to this discussion. > > But dismissing people's concerns as "patriotic" or "religious" isn't > helping your case IMO. That was not my intend i had not intended to dismiss anyones concern What i was trying to do with this 2nd part of the mail was to document a subjective observation. The reason was simply _IF_ this observation is somewhat correct, then awareness of this could help people next time. As i stated i expect noone to change their position here. But maybe next time we have a similar growing disagreement being aware of the possible effects of emotional statements from fellow developers could be helpfull. thx, and ill try to end this debate in this thread, this minor comment just felt it fits better here [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Breaking DRM is a little like attempting to break through a door even though the window is wide open and the only thing in the house is a bunch of things you dont want and which you would get tomorrow for free anyway [-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 251 bytes --] _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-04 17:53 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-07-06 16:04 Lynne 2023-07-06 16:19 ` Jean-Baptiste Kempf [not found] ` <4e164164-f730-4b5e-9edc-1a37b10684e2@betaapp.fastmail.com-NZg-97N----9> 2023-07-07 6:40 ` Lynne 2023-07-07 6:53 ` Ingo Oppermann 2023-07-07 7:36 ` Steven Liu 2023-09-26 13:37 ` Leo Izen 2023-07-07 15:06 ` Michael Niedermayer 2023-07-07 15:33 ` Lynne 2023-07-07 22:51 ` Michael Niedermayer 2023-07-09 10:14 ` Anton Khirnov 2023-09-22 9:27 ` Michael Niedermayer 2023-09-22 9:32 ` Paul B Mahol 2023-09-22 14:49 ` Michael Niedermayer 2023-09-22 15:27 ` Paul B Mahol 2023-09-26 8:47 ` Jean-Baptiste Kempf 2023-09-22 10:04 ` Nicolas George 2023-09-22 11:42 ` Paul B Mahol 2023-09-26 9:13 ` Anton Khirnov 2023-09-26 15:09 ` Michael Niedermayer 2023-09-26 15:14 ` Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel 2023-09-26 15:30 ` Anton Khirnov 2023-09-26 16:27 ` Derek Buitenhuis 2023-09-26 17:24 ` Michael Niedermayer 2023-09-26 17:16 ` Michael Niedermayer 2023-09-26 17:25 ` James Almer 2023-09-26 18:03 ` Nicolas George 2023-09-26 18:14 ` Anton Khirnov 2023-09-26 18:24 ` Nicolas George 2023-09-26 18:27 ` Vittorio Giovara 2023-09-26 18:28 ` Nicolas George [not found] ` <F3D5B4BB-AE60-401F-800E-6246B9F359A4@cosmin.at> 2023-09-26 22:50 ` [FFmpeg-devel] SDR choices Cosmin Stejerean via ffmpeg-devel 2023-10-03 19:22 ` [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Release 6.1 Michael Niedermayer 2023-10-04 15:19 ` Anton Khirnov 2023-10-04 16:54 ` Lynne 2023-10-04 17:53 ` Michael Niedermayer [this message] 2023-09-26 21:20 ` Ronald S. Bultje 2023-09-27 13:53 ` Tomas Härdin 2023-09-27 20:18 ` Michael Niedermayer 2023-09-27 20:27 ` Nicolas George 2023-09-28 8:48 ` Ronald S. Bultje 2023-09-28 14:45 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont 2023-09-28 15:33 ` Nicolas George 2023-09-28 15:58 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont 2023-09-28 16:13 ` Nicolas George 2023-09-28 16:34 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont 2023-09-28 16:42 ` Nicolas George 2023-09-28 14:32 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont 2023-09-28 15:28 ` Nicolas George 2023-09-28 16:22 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont 2023-09-28 16:32 ` Nicolas George 2023-09-28 16:35 ` Paul B Mahol 2023-09-28 16:38 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont 2023-09-28 16:41 ` Nicolas George 2023-09-28 16:42 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont 2023-09-28 16:43 ` Nicolas George 2023-09-28 17:27 ` Rémi Denis-Courmont 2023-07-08 1:46 ` Neal Gompa 2023-07-09 10:13 ` Anton Khirnov 2023-10-09 3:37 ` Lynne 2023-10-09 17:41 ` Michael Niedermayer 2023-10-10 15:19 ` Neal Gompa 2023-10-28 16:49 ` Michael Niedermayer 2023-10-28 16:56 ` James Almer 2023-10-28 19:23 ` Lynne 2023-10-29 4:51 ` Michael Niedermayer 2023-10-29 5:57 ` Lynne 2023-11-07 7:36 ` Lynne 2023-11-07 16:47 ` Tristan Matthews 2023-11-08 1:26 ` Steven Liu 2023-11-08 1:29 ` Steven Liu [not found] ` <NichQkq--3-9@lynne.ee-NichTw8----9> 2023-11-09 8:20 ` Lynne 2023-11-09 9:46 ` epirat07 2023-11-09 9:48 ` Gyan Doshi 2023-11-10 1:47 ` Michael Niedermayer 2023-10-29 9:30 ` Nicolas George 2023-10-29 13:51 ` Jean-Baptiste Kempf 2023-10-29 14:17 ` Nicolas George 2023-10-29 16:27 ` Jean-Baptiste Kempf 2023-10-29 16:40 ` Nicolas George 2023-10-29 16:43 ` Jean-Baptiste Kempf 2023-10-29 16:45 ` Nicolas George 2023-10-29 15:10 ` Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel 2023-10-29 16:25 ` Jean-Baptiste Kempf 2023-10-29 17:20 ` Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel 2023-10-29 17:56 ` Jean-Baptiste Kempf 2023-10-29 18:12 ` Nicolas George 2023-10-29 18:22 ` Jean-Baptiste Kempf 2023-10-29 18:31 ` Nicolas George 2023-10-29 19:11 ` Jean-Baptiste Kempf 2023-10-29 19:19 ` Nicolas George 2023-10-29 18:47 ` Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel 2023-10-29 18:46 ` Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel 2023-10-29 19:27 ` Jean-Baptiste Kempf 2023-11-01 17:53 ` Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel 2023-10-29 16:42 ` Jean-Baptiste Kempf 2023-10-29 16:49 ` James Almer 2023-10-29 17:01 ` Jean-Baptiste Kempf
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20231004175348.GN3543730@pb2 \ --to=michael@niedermayer.cc \ --cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone: git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \ ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com public-inbox-index ffmpegdev Example config snippet for mirrors. AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git