On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 10:04:16PM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote: > Michael Niedermayer: > > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer > > --- > > doc/developer.texi | 9 +++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/doc/developer.texi b/doc/developer.texi > > index 383120daaa..1c0091fc74 100644 > > --- a/doc/developer.texi > > +++ b/doc/developer.texi > > @@ -856,6 +856,15 @@ way to get everyone's patches reviewed sooner. > > Reviews must be constructive and when rejecting a patch the reviewer must explain > > their reasons and ideally suggest an alternative approach. > > > > +If a change is pushed without being sent to ffmpeg-devel, the developer > > +pushing it must annouce doing so on the ffmpeg-devel mailing list immedeatly. > > +@example > > +forgot a semicolon in this patch, pushed a seperate fix > > +pushed my new autograd engine and stable diffusion filter. Didnt want to > > +go through the bikeshed if that belongs in FFmpeg, go to the GA if you want > > +it removed. Otherwise Just tell me what i should improve and ill look into it. > > +@end example > > This encourages pushing patches (even completely new filters) without > sending them to the ML. That was not the intend but if you look at "cvslog" and ffmpeg-devel, you will notice that there are things being pushed that have not been seen on the ffmpeg-devel mailing list. thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Old school: Use the lowest level language in which you can solve the problem conveniently. New school: Use the highest level language in which the latest supercomputer can solve the problem without the user falling asleep waiting.