On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 09:53:11PM +0300, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > Le tiistaina 8. elokuuta 2023, 18.22.49 EEST Michael Niedermayer a écrit : > > > > That is missing that people suggest a path forward but > > > > with too few details to easily walk that path. > > > > > > Uh, I hate to state the patently obvious, but if "no path forward is > > > needed", then there should logically be _no_ "details to walk [a] path". > > > Conversely, if avradio does not belong in FFmpeg, as Kieran, Tomas and > > > others have been arguing, then there is no path forward to be given on > > > FFmpeg-devel. > > > > > > > > > And besides I don't think it's even fair to state that "too few details" > > > were given. People did suggest making this a new separate project > > > properly isolated from FFmpeg internals, and/or joining efforts with > > > existing OSS SDR projects rather than FFmpeg. Some specific projects have > > > even been cited. > > > > > > As far as FFmpeg(-devel) is concerned, I can't think how it could/should > > > reasonably get any more specific than that. > > > > The saying goes, one cannot win an Argument on the Internet. > > So, iam not trying to, but > > > > IIRC, a while ago you said iam obliged to work on FFmpeg. Thats > > simply not the case. > > I have made some preposterous statements in my dark past, but I am pretty sure > that I didn't make any statement to that effect, no. Not litterally, but i think you implied it in a reply to nicolas: Or at least thats how i read it, maybe i just misunderstood, this is really not important, just for completeness, here is what i refered to: in "Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] avformat: add Software Defined Radio support" > Unless you have commitments that we are not privy of, nobody can tell > you how you are supposed to be spending your time and skills. FYI https://fflabs.eu/about/ thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Never trust a computer, one day, it may think you are the virus. -- Compn