On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 12:03:10AM +0200, Lynne wrote: > Jul 2, 2023, 23:15 by michael@niedermayer.cc: > > > On Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 08:55:40PM +0200, Lynne wrote: > > > >> Jul 2, 2023, 13:01 by michael@niedermayer.cc: > >> > >> > On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 04:38:46PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > >> > > >> >> On Fri, 30 Jun 2023, at 16:08, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >> >> > Also as said previously, If there is at least a 2nd developer working > >> >> > on this then we could & should move this to a seperate libraray (libavradio) > >> >> > >> >> Why wait for a 2nd dev? > >> >> > >> > > >> > as libavradio so far has been the only actionable suggestion. > >> > ill move the code to that and next revission or the one after that > >> > will be in libavradio. > >> > > >> > thx > >> > > >> > >> Could you move it to another repository which other developers > >> have access to, like nv-codec-headers? It'll still be an official library > >> of the project, and patches for it should still be sent to this ML, > >> but it would keep the main repo from becoming a monorepo. > >> > > > > Yes > > https://git.ffmpeg.org/libavradio > > gil@git.ffmpeg.org:libavradio > > > > everyone should have acess, but keys a syced from videolan a while ago, so > > if someones is missing, mail me > > > > PS: i found a DAB library that i think can take raw IQ data and return > > AAC frames. With that adding DAB support should be alot more practical > > than a full implementation of all layers of DAB > > > > Thanks. I look forward to see what becomes of it. > Whilst you're at it, could you also make an empty repo > for my streaming protocol/container, with the same access > permissions? It should be named "avstream", without "lib", > as it contains specifications and a reference library, like nut. created: https://git.ffmpeg.org/avstream gil@git.ffmpeg.org:avstream you have power do do non fast forward pushes if need arrises git log mail should go to ffmpeg-cvslog@ffmpeg.org emailmaxlines= 10000 thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB If the United States is serious about tackling the national security threats related to an insecure 5G network, it needs to rethink the extent to which it values corporate profits and government espionage over security.-Bruce Schneier