On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 07:20:05PM +0300, Caleb Etemesi wrote: > Hi > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 5:28 PM Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 02, 2023 at 03:21:08PM -0700, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 3:17 PM Michael Niedermayer > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 08:29:40AM -0700, pal@sandflow.com wrote: > > > > > From: caleb > > [...] > > > > [...] > > > > > +/** > > > > > + * Drops bits from lower bits in the bit buffer. buf contains the > > bit buffers. > > > > > + * nbits is the number of bits to remove. > > > > > + */ > > > > > +av_always_inline > > > > > +static void jpeg2000_bitbuf_drop_bits_lsb(StateVars *buf, uint8_t > > nbits) > > > > > +{ > > > > > + if (buf->bits_left < nbits) { > > > > > > > > > + av_log(NULL, AV_LOG_ERROR, "Invalid bit read of %d, bits in > > buffer are %d\n", nbits, buf->bits_left); > > > > > + av_assert0(0); > > > > This one is present to ensure for all test cases, we never overread bytes But can a crafted input stream trigger an assert failure ? If no then the assert is ok If yes then its not ok, i mean a "./ffmpeg -i /dev/random" should not crash, it should provide the user with some error and teh code should cleanly return not abort I simply do not know if theres a check or something somewhere that ensures this is ok and just a extra check (which is ok) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > +int > > > > > +ff_jpeg2000_decode_htj2k(const Jpeg2000DecoderContext *s, > > Jpeg2000CodingStyle *codsty, Jpeg2000T1Context *t1, Jpeg2000Cblk *cblk, > > > > > + int width, int height, int magp, uint8_t > > roi_shift) > > > > > +{ > > > > > + uint8_t p0 = 0; // Number of placeholder passes > > > > > + uint32_t Lcup; // Length of HT cleanup segment > > > > > + uint32_t Lref; // Length of Refinement segment > > > > > + uint32_t Scup; // HT cleanup segment suffix length > > > > > + uint32_t Pcup; // HT cleanup segment prefix length > > > > > + > > > > > + uint8_t S_blk; // Number of skipped magnitude > > bitplanes > > > > > + uint8_t pLSB; > > > > > + > > > > > + uint8_t *Dcup; // Byte of an HT cleanup segment > > > > > + uint8_t *Dref; // Byte of an HT refinement segment > > > > > + > > > > > + int z_blk; // Number of ht coding pass > > > > > + > > > > > + uint8_t empty_passes; > > > > > + > > > > > + StateVars mag_sgn; // Magnitude and Sign > > > > > + StateVars mel; // Adaptive run-length coding > > > > > + StateVars vlc; // Variable Length coding > > > > > + StateVars sig_prop; // Significance propagation > > > > > + > > > > > + MelDecoderState mel_state; > > > > > + > > > > > + int ret; > > > > > + > > > > > + /* Temporary buffers */ > > > > > + int32_t *sample_buf; > > > > > + uint8_t *block_states; > > > > > + > > > > > + int32_t n, val; // Post-processing > > > > > + > > > > > + int32_t M_b = magp; > > > > > + av_assert0(width <= 1024U && height <= 1024U); > > > > > + av_assert0(width * height <= 4096); > > > > > + av_assert0(width * height > 0); > > > > > > > > Has this decoder been tested with some fuzzer ? > > > > > > Yes. > > > > ok > > > > > > > > > > > I see a bunch of asserts in it and i dont immedeatly see what would > > prevent them from > > > > triggering > > > > > maybe you can add comments to the asserts that explain why these are > > > guranteed to be true thx > > > > > These ones are to check code block constraints, the jpeg2000 spec limits > code blocks to be between 2^2 and 2^10. The spec isnt that important here. The important part is that our code checks this, so no input can trigger the asserts. I think we do check this, so i think the asserts are ok thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB If you think the mosad wants you dead since a long time then you are either wrong or dead since a long time.