essOn Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 12:03:02AM +0800, Wang Bin wrote: > > version_major.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > a87056c2fe65d68b2cf5d1de06be28ea40c69b73 0001-Bump-major-version-of-swresample.patch > From e3e6a3833f2fba743ee9c05962e804e9e570dd75 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: wang-bin > Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 23:54:51 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] Bump major version of swresample > > --- > libswresample/version_major.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/libswresample/version_major.h b/libswresample/version_major.h > index 7f265c2073..dd13f2bbe3 100644 > --- a/libswresample/version_major.h > +++ b/libswresample/version_major.h > @@ -26,6 +26,6 @@ > * Libswresample version macros > */ > > -#define LIBSWRESAMPLE_VERSION_MAJOR 4 > +#define LIBSWRESAMPLE_VERSION_MAJOR 5 No oppinion if this should be changed now before 6.0 or not but if its done it should be done on master and release/6.0 at the same time and LIBSWRESAMPLE_VERSION_MINOR needs to be reset too while LIBSWRESAMPLE_VERSION_MINOR needs to be +1 on master compared to release/6.0 oppinon from others is welcome here. Iam not a user of the releases so its hard for me to really guess which way is better. Its a little messy to change now thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Rewriting code that is poorly written but fully understood is good. Rewriting code that one doesnt understand is a sign that one is less smart than the original author, trying to rewrite it will not make it better.