From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC5844FC1 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 19:15:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2890268BAFB; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 21:15:44 +0200 (EET) Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.196]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34B9E68A630 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 21:15:37 +0200 (EET) Received: (Authenticated sender: michael@niedermayer.cc) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46F42E0002 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 19:15:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 20:15:35 +0100 From: Michael Niedermayer To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: <20221215191535.GP3806951@pb2> References: <20221024074221.217-1-d.kozinski@samsung.com> <5612537e-7e68-ee4c-17cd-30a42980915c@gmail.com> <20221027164524.GL4048421@pb2> <003b01d90eed$852039e0$8f60ada0$@samsung.com> <20221214214531.GO3806951@pb2> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v14 9/9] avcodec/evc: Changes in Changelog and MAINTAINERS files X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8052618777437233474==" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --===============8052618777437233474== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bgCgbCt+U3u1f4Pw" Content-Disposition: inline --bgCgbCt+U3u1f4Pw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 02:11:28AM +0100, Lynne wrote: > Dec 14, 2022, 22:45 by michael@niedermayer.cc: >=20 > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 07:42:23PM +0100, Lynne wrote: > > > >> Dec 13, 2022, 13:22 by d.kozinski@samsung.com: > >> > >> > We made some changes in our EVC wrapper implementation and would lik= e to > >> > submit new patches to patchwork, but it's still unclear to me how to= deal > >> > with the MAINTAINERS file.=20 > >> > > >> > Should I leave the following lines: > >> > + libxevd.c Dawid Kozinski > >> > + libxeve.c, Dawid Kozinski > >> > + evc.c, evc.h Dawid Kozinski > >> > + evcdec.c Dawid Kozinski > >> > + evc_parser.c Dawid Kozinski > >> > > >> > or should I remove them? > >> > > >> > We are expecting a clear and consistent standpoint on this matter. > >> > > >> > >> Get rid of them. Michael has made it clear anyone on the list > >> must have commit rights. I'm not for blocking anyone from having > >> commit rights, but you've made zero contributions to the project > >> so far, and maintaining requires some level of dedication. > >> > > > > You surely have the right to object to Dawid having commit rights. > > And i understand your argument why, but that has nothing to do with > > me or the list. There are people on the MAINTAINERS list who do not > > have commit rights. > > for example the developers who i presume are paid by loongson to mainta= in=20 > > the mips/loongson code do not currently have commit right. > > Seems a similar case to me > > >=20 > You're making assumptions. You've said that anyone who's on maintainers > needs push rights. Then you said that unless someone explicitly asks not = to > get push rights, they will if they're added to maintainers. Right now, the > person hasn't said anything, yet you're assuming he doesn't want push rig= hts. There are many reasons why someone in MAINTAINERS might have no push access * lack of git knowledge * explicitly asked not to receive git write * messy patches submitted in the past * simply forgotten * a past reason which was not noticed that it no longer is true Once Dawids patches are applied, it will be easy to judge their quality based on the changes which where asked for in the review. One developer objected to Dawid having write access currently. If it was not for that i would tend toward giving Dawid write access if he wants to maintain the code.=20 If he personally wants to maintain it or if he is paid to maintain it doesnt really matter. Whoever maintains code benefits from being able to change said code. thx [...] --=20 Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws. -- Plato --bgCgbCt+U3u1f4Pw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABEIAB0WIQSf8hKLFH72cwut8TNhHseHBAsPqwUCY5tyUAAKCRBhHseHBAsP q9mqAJ9JXc/Qtp3s+vI8pBGVxPA7GQo3awCggFtse/MK5ngCWqhmdCuoucpLxCQ= =7kk5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bgCgbCt+U3u1f4Pw-- --===============8052618777437233474== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". --===============8052618777437233474==--