* [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 5.2 ? @ 2022-11-03 21:59 Michael Niedermayer 2022-11-03 22:26 ` James Almer 2022-11-04 10:30 ` Jean-Baptiste Kempf 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Michael Niedermayer @ 2022-11-03 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 300 bytes --] Hi all do we want a release/5.2 branch made in december ? I think that would be what previous release shedule suggestions would point to thx -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible. -- Voltaire [-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 251 bytes --] _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 5.2 ? 2022-11-03 21:59 [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 5.2 ? Michael Niedermayer @ 2022-11-03 22:26 ` James Almer 2022-11-04 10:30 ` Jean-Baptiste Kempf 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: James Almer @ 2022-11-03 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ffmpeg-devel On 11/3/2022 6:59 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi all > > do we want a release/5.2 branch made in december ? > > I think that would be what previous release shedule suggestions would > point to > > thx Changelog looks a tad short post 5.1, but i guess there has been more work in refactoring and improving existing code than adding new features that get mentioned there. Also, afaik Debian freeze is in January, and i think it'd be best for us if they go with 5.1, the release we declared LTS, than if they end up going with 5.2 and thus force our hand to treat it as one too. So we might want to postpone a new release until late January or February. It would also give us time to decide if we do a major soname bump for it too, to get rid of deprecated API that could be constraining new work (I think Anton wanted some gone soon for that reason). _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 5.2 ? 2022-11-03 21:59 [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 5.2 ? Michael Niedermayer 2022-11-03 22:26 ` James Almer @ 2022-11-04 10:30 ` Jean-Baptiste Kempf 2022-11-04 14:09 ` Michael Niedermayer 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Jean-Baptiste Kempf @ 2022-11-04 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ffmpeg-devel On Thu, 3 Nov 2022, at 22:59, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > do we want a release/5.2 branch made in december ? Based on what? Master or 5.1? -- Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President +33 672 704 734 _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 5.2 ? 2022-11-04 10:30 ` Jean-Baptiste Kempf @ 2022-11-04 14:09 ` Michael Niedermayer 2022-11-04 14:33 ` Artem Galin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Michael Niedermayer @ 2022-11-04 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1180 bytes --] On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 11:30:38AM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > On Thu, 3 Nov 2022, at 22:59, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > do we want a release/5.2 branch made in december ? > > Based on what? Master or 5.1? new release branches are cut from master it seems not a great idea ATM though so iam asking what people want as the previous plans where for one in december. These plans just dont seem that great with the LTS prior So question for december is: 5.2 in December / 5.2 in June / 5.2 in January and then next we could do: (if we go with 2 releases per year) [5.3 would be 5.2 in the 5.2 june case] A B C 2023 june 5.3 / 5.3 LTS / 6.0 2023 december 5.4 LTS / 5.4 / 6.1 LTS anyone has any other suggestions / comments? thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Awnsering whenever a program halts or runs forever is On a turing machine, in general impossible (turings halting problem). On any real computer, always possible as a real computer has a finite number of states N, and will either halt in less than N cycles or never halt. [-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 251 bytes --] _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 5.2 ? 2022-11-04 14:09 ` Michael Niedermayer @ 2022-11-04 14:33 ` Artem Galin 2022-11-04 14:36 ` Paul B Mahol 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Artem Galin @ 2022-11-04 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches DTS to PTS reorder bsf, threading changes, ddagrab, oneVPL support with AV1 HW encode for new ARC Gfx as well as DX11 for QSV are valuable items for next 5.2 release On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 at 14:10, Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 11:30:38AM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Nov 2022, at 22:59, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > do we want a release/5.2 branch made in december ? > > > > Based on what? Master or 5.1? > > new release branches are cut from master > it seems not a great idea ATM though so iam asking what people want > as the previous plans where for one in december. These plans just > dont seem that great with the LTS prior > > So question for december is: > 5.2 in December / 5.2 in June / 5.2 in January > > and then next we could do: (if we go with 2 releases per year) > [5.3 would be 5.2 in the 5.2 june case] > A B C > 2023 june 5.3 / 5.3 LTS / 6.0 > 2023 december 5.4 LTS / 5.4 / 6.1 LTS > > anyone has any other suggestions / comments? > > thx > > > [...] > > -- > Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB > > Awnsering whenever a program halts or runs forever is > On a turing machine, in general impossible (turings halting problem). > On any real computer, always possible as a real computer has a finite > number > of states N, and will either halt in less than N cycles or never halt. > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 5.2 ? 2022-11-04 14:33 ` Artem Galin @ 2022-11-04 14:36 ` Paul B Mahol 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Paul B Mahol @ 2022-11-04 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches On 11/4/22, Artem Galin <artem.galin@gmail.com> wrote: > DTS to PTS reorder bsf, threading changes, ddagrab, oneVPL support with AV1 > HW > encode for new ARC Gfx as well as DX11 for QSV are valuable items for next > 5.2 release Yes, anything else is not valuable at all and should be removed. > > On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 at 14:10, Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc> > wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 11:30:38AM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: >> > On Thu, 3 Nov 2022, at 22:59, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >> > > do we want a release/5.2 branch made in december ? >> > >> > Based on what? Master or 5.1? >> >> new release branches are cut from master >> it seems not a great idea ATM though so iam asking what people want >> as the previous plans where for one in december. These plans just >> dont seem that great with the LTS prior >> >> So question for december is: >> 5.2 in December / 5.2 in June / 5.2 in January >> >> and then next we could do: (if we go with 2 releases per year) >> [5.3 would be 5.2 in the 5.2 june case] >> A B C >> 2023 june 5.3 / 5.3 LTS / 6.0 >> 2023 december 5.4 LTS / 5.4 / 6.1 LTS >> >> anyone has any other suggestions / comments? >> >> thx >> >> >> [...] >> >> -- >> Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB >> >> Awnsering whenever a program halts or runs forever is >> On a turing machine, in general impossible (turings halting problem). >> On any real computer, always possible as a real computer has a finite >> number >> of states N, and will either halt in less than N cycles or never halt. >> _______________________________________________ >> ffmpeg-devel mailing list >> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org >> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel >> >> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email >> ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". >> > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-11-04 14:36 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-11-03 21:59 [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 5.2 ? Michael Niedermayer 2022-11-03 22:26 ` James Almer 2022-11-04 10:30 ` Jean-Baptiste Kempf 2022-11-04 14:09 ` Michael Niedermayer 2022-11-04 14:33 ` Artem Galin 2022-11-04 14:36 ` Paul B Mahol
Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone: git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \ ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com public-inbox-index ffmpegdev Example config snippet for mirrors. AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git